On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 05:36, Viktor Jaegerskuepper
wrote:
>
> Dave Airlie:
> > On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:34, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:42 AM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:48 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at
Dave Airlie:
> On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:34, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:42 AM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:48 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:42, Ilia Mirkin
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:34, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:42 AM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:48 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:42, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:42 AM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:48 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:42, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thing is, I think that would not be enough - with the
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:48 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:42, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > Thing is, I think that would not be enough - with the "recent" (like
> > > past 2 years) CSO/state change detection
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:47, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:42, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >
> > Thing is, I think that would not be enough - with the "recent" (like
> > past 2 years) CSO/state change detection changes, I think that you can
> > end up with no sampler set for a
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 08:42, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> Thing is, I think that would not be enough - with the "recent" (like
> past 2 years) CSO/state change detection changes, I think that you can
> end up with no sampler set for a buffer view. Perhaps someone with the
> hw can investigate what
Thing is, I think that would not be enough - with the "recent" (like
past 2 years) CSO/state change detection changes, I think that you can
end up with no sampler set for a buffer view. Perhaps someone with the
hw can investigate what goes wrong?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:42 PM Marek Olšák
Reverting the st/mesa commit would be fine.
Marek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:06 PM Viktor Jaegerskuepper
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ilia,
> >
> > Ilia Mirkin:
> > > If you can reproduce the issue
> > > at will, could I recommend you try undoing
Hi Ilia,
Ilia Mirkin:
> If you can reproduce the issue
> at will, could I recommend you try undoing this hunk:
>
> @@ -1192,7 +1192,6 @@ try_pbo_upload_common(struct gl_context *ctx,
>return false;
>
> cso_save_state(cso, (CSO_BIT_FRAGMENT_SAMPLER_VIEWS |
> -
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:06 PM Viktor Jaegerskuepper
wrote:
>
> Hi Ilia,
>
> Ilia Mirkin:
> > If you can reproduce the issue
> > at will, could I recommend you try undoing this hunk:
> >
> > @@ -1192,7 +1192,6 @@ try_pbo_upload_common(struct gl_context *ctx,
> >return false;
> >
> >
Hi Viktor,
I'm not intimately familiar with AMD hardware (but Marek is, I'm sure
he'll opine when he gets a chance). Note that RV7xx is among the
DX10-class hardware which is older less tested nowadays compared to
the DX11-class r600-derived hardware (EG/NI), which admittedly is also
not exactly
12 matches
Mail list logo
