On 19 October 2016 at 15:55, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 19 October 2016 at 11:35, Grigori Goronzy wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-04 12:32, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 2 October
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 19 October 2016 at 11:35, Grigori Goronzy wrote:
>> On 2016-10-04 12:32, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:17, Axel Davy wrote:
I'd prefer myself
On 19 October 2016 at 11:35, Grigori Goronzy wrote:
> On 2016-10-04 12:32, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:17, Axel Davy wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd prefer myself Oct 14, because we have a lot of patches for nine, and
>>> they deserve more cleaning
On 2016-10-04 12:32, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 2 October 2016 at 14:17, Axel Davy wrote:
I'd prefer myself Oct 14, because we have a lot of patches for nine,
and
they deserve more cleaning and testing, but if it's Oct 7, we'll try
be on
time.
14th it is. As mentioned before:
On 04/10/2016 12:32, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 2 October 2016 at 14:17, Axel Davy wrote:
Hi,
If I understand, there hasn't been yet statements on whether the freeze is
for Oct 7 or Oct 14.
Could there be one ?
I'd prefer myself Oct 14, because we have a lot of patches for
On 4 October 2016 at 15:57, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 4 October 2016 at 02:05, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emil Velikov
>>>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 4 October 2016 at 02:05, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://soundcloud.com/christian-gmeiner
2016-10-04 12:26 GMT+02:00 Emil Velikov :
> On 4 October 2016 at 02:05, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>>
On 2 October 2016 at 14:17, Axel Davy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I understand, there hasn't been yet statements on whether the freeze is
> for Oct 7 or Oct 14.
>
> Could there be one ?
>
> I'd prefer myself Oct 14, because we have a lot of patches for nine, and
> they deserve more
On 4 October 2016 at 02:05, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and soon
>> it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released.
>>
Hi,
If I understand, there hasn't been yet statements on whether the freeze
is for Oct 7 or Oct 14.
Could there be one ?
I'd prefer myself Oct 14, because we have a lot of patches for nine, and
they deserve more cleaning and testing, but if it's Oct 7, we'll try be
on time.
Axel
On
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 30 September 2016 at 01:07, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák
On 30 September 2016 at 02:31, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 30 September 2016 at 01:07, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák
On 30.09.2016 03:31, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 30 September 2016 at 01:07, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák wrote:
Hi,
It's been almost 4 months
On 30 September 2016 at 01:07, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>>
>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was
On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>
> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and soon
> > it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released.
> >
On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and soon
> it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released.
>
> Is there any reason we haven't created the stable branch yet?
>
> Ideally, we would
18 matches
Mail list logo