On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:25 AM Mike Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As everyone has likely noticed, we've had a significant uptick of spam on
> Mesa-related IRC channels lately. Sometimes these occurrences go on for many
> hours before someone takes action.
>
> I'd lik
Hi,
As everyone has likely noticed, we've had a significant uptick of spam on
Mesa-related IRC channels lately. Sometimes these occurrences go on for
many hours before someone takes action.
I'd like to request that all commonly-affected channels (#dri-devel,
#intel-3d, #freedesktop, ???) take
Pierre Moreau writes:
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau
> ---
> src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api/dispatch.hpp | 4 ++
> src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api/program.cpp | 29 -
> src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/core/program.cpp | 68
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Emil Velikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #26 from Eugene Shalygin
---
(In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #25)
> Just found that dGPU wakes up when I connect an Android phone via USB.
No, any USB device makes that. kernel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Eugene Shalygin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Emil Velikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #23 from Emil Velikov ---
(In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #22)
> I don't quite understand the situation too. I observe two opposite
> behaviours with the same kernel version (4.9): lspci wakes up
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #22 from Eugene Shalygin
---
(In reply to Mauro Santos from comment #21)
> The difference between both is that with 4.4.52 the device stays powered off
> when using lspci but with 4.9.11 the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #21 from Mauro Santos ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #20)
> Previously lspci would just read back from pci config space for stuff that
> was not cached which resulted in reading back all ones
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Eugene Shalygin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #20 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to Mauro Santos from comment #19)
> With 4.4.52 lspci says:
> 03:00.0 Display controller [0380]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
> Mars [Radeon HD 8670A/8670M/8750M]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #19 from Mauro Santos ---
(In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #18)
> (In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #17)
> > To clarify: lspci was never waking up the dGPU. I assume that it was always
> >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #18 from Emil Velikov ---
(In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #17)
> To clarify: lspci was never waking up the dGPU. I assume that it was always
> reading the device config file.
The kernel behaviour
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #17 from Eugene Shalygin
---
To clarify: lspci was never waking up the dGPU. I assume that it was always
reading the device config file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #16 from Eugene Shalygin
---
> Eugene if behaviour has changed across kernel versions...
I'm confident that from 2014 and up to 4.10.0 on my Gentoo machine this was
never the case. I don't
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #15 from Emil Velikov ---
(In reply to Mauro Santos from comment #13)
> Aren't most patches in mesa and libdrm by now? At least the versions
> provided by Arch already seem to have the patches (or at least
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #14 from Emil Velikov ---
(In reply to Tobias Droste from comment #12)
> (In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #11)
> > I have the same problem: Qt5 wakes up dGPU on launch [1]. However, I believe
> >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #13 from Mauro Santos ---
(In reply to Tobias Droste from comment #12)
> (In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #11)
> > I have the same problem: Qt5 wakes up dGPU on launch [1]. However, I believe
> >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Droste ---
(In reply to Eugene Shalygin from comment #11)
> I have the same problem: Qt5 wakes up dGPU on launch [1]. However, I believe
> that this is a kernel problem: the dGPU wakes up when a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #11 from Eugene Shalygin
---
I have the same problem: Qt5 wakes up dGPU on launch [1]. However, I believe
that this is a kernel problem: the dGPU wakes up when a program tries to read
from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #10 from Emil Velikov ---
Guys, the kernel (v4.10) has been updated to provide the revision field [1], at
the same time libdrm (v2.4.75) has API which does not fetch it [2] and the mesa
patches [3] to us the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Andreas Radke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #9 from Michel Dänzer ---
I'm not sure what exactly you're asking me to do. Can you just ask on the
amd-gfx mailing list directly?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #8 from Emil Velikov ---
The kernel patch is out and should fit the mailing list archives in due time.
Michel since Jammy is no longer around can you check (forward to AMDGPU-PRO
team) about the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #7 from Mauro Santos ---
As a user, any band aid that will mask the problem until the proper long term
fix is in place will be very much welcomed.
As to how it is implemented, I am not familiar with the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #6 from Emil Velikov ---
Short term ideas:
libdrm
- cheat, don't parse ./config. Read the revision_id file and set to zero if
missing. Default for all or toggle {config,revision_id} by envvar/API ?
- roll
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #5 from Emil Velikov ---
That's because the drmDevice API retrieves the device revision id.
IIRC that was something explicitly requested by Jammy and the only way to get
the info is to parse ./config which
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
.From: bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.orgSent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 10:25To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.orgSubject: [Mesa-dev] [Bug 98502] Delay when starting firefox, thunderbird or chromium and dmesg spam
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #4 from Mauro Santos ---
Created attachment 127635
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127635=edit
Bisect log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #3 from Mauro Santos ---
After bisecting (hope I've done it right), the first bad commit is
be239326aa4f9317d42ee07f0f51179c8b3d5b22
I've tried to revert this commit and test again but I haven't been able
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #2 from Mauro Santos ---
I'll try to bisect and see if I can find the offending commit, I'll post back
when I have a result.
Are there any tests you'd like me to do or other information you'd like me to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
--- Comment #1 from Alex Deucher ---
If this is a regression can you bisect?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98502
Bug ID: 98502
Summary: Delay when starting firefox, thunderbird or chromium
and dmesg spam
Product: Mesa
Version: 13.0
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux
Kenneth Graunke kenn...@whitecape.org writes:
When an application is using PBOs, we attempt to use the BLT engine to
perform ReadPixels. If that fails due to some restrictions, it's useful
to raise a performance warning.
In the non-PBO case, we always use a CPU mapping since getting the
Unless the application is using PBOs, any call to glReadPixels will hit
this message. Hitting this does mean mapping the buffer and accessing
it via the CPU, but that isn't necessarily the worst thing in the world.
apitrace's image dumping code hits this path, causing it to spam
hundreds
hits this path, causing it to spam
hundreds of thousands of performance warnings via ARB_debug_output,
which makes it difficult to see actual errors.
Maybe only do so when dumping out of the PBO path? It seems like this
is something useful to know about in that case.
pgpA16ElFYZ74.pgp
When an application is using PBOs, we attempt to use the BLT engine to
perform ReadPixels. If that fails due to some restrictions, it's useful
to raise a performance warning.
In the non-PBO case, we always use a CPU mapping since getting the data
into client memory requires a CPU-side copy.
39 matches
Mail list logo