Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On 4/12/19 3:45 pm, Jason Ekstrand wrote: On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:19 PM Dave Airlie > wrote: On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:39, Marek Olšák mailto:mar...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeonsi: Add support for midstream bitrate change in encoder

Patch is Reviewed-by: Boyuan Zhang mailto:boyuan.zh...@amd.com>> Regards, Boyuan From: Liu, Leo Sent: December 3, 2019 9:08 PM To: Marek Olšák ; Sahu, Satyajit ; Zhang, Boyuan Cc: ML Mesa-dev ; Sharma, Deepak Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeonsi: Add support for midstream bitrate

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2019-12-03 20:45:33) > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:19 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:39, Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > translation. > > > > 1)

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

Quoting Kristian Høgsberg (2019-12-04 10:43:46) > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Rob Clark wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:48 AM Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:39 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

Quoting Marek Olšák (2019-12-03 16:39:15) > Hi, > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > translation. > > 1) Move classic drivers to a fork of Mesa, and remove them from master. > Classic > drivers won't share any code with master. glvnd will load them, but

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

Quoting Dave Airlie (2019-12-03 18:18:55) > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:39, Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > > translation. > > > > 1) Move classic drivers to a fork of Mesa, and remove them from master. > > Classic

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:48 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > On Wed., Dec. 4, 2019, 01:20 Tapani Pälli, wrote: >> >> Hi; >> >> On 12/4/19 2:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium >> > translation. >> > >> > 1) Move classic

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeonsi: Add support for midstream bitrate change in encoder

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] Acked-by: Deepak Sharma -Original Message- From: Sahu, Satyajit Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 8:31 PM To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Zhang, Boyuan ; Sharma, Deepak ; Sahu, Satyajit Subject: [PATCH] radeonsi: Add support

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:39 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > Hi, > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > translation. > > 1) Move classic drivers to a fork of Mesa, and remove them from master. > Classic drivers won't share any code with master. glvnd will load them,

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:48 AM Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:39 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > > translation. > > > > 1) Move classic drivers to a fork of Mesa, and remove them from master. > >

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Rob Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:48 AM Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:39 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > > > translation. > > > > > > 1)

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 5:51 AM Timothy Arceri wrote: > > > On 4/12/19 3:45 pm, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:19 PM Dave Airlie > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 10:39, Marek Olšák > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Wednesday, 2019-12-04 09:48:28 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:39 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > > translation. > > > > 1) Move classic drivers to a fork of Mesa, and remove them from

[Mesa-dev] [ANNOUNCE] mesa 19.3.0-rc6

Hi list, Available today is mesa 19.3.0-rc6. Things are starting to slow down, and there are now only two open issues in the 19.3 milestone, so I'm hopeful that next week will bring 19.3.0 final, and not an rc7, but I can always be surprised. By far radv + aco dominate the list of changes, but

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On 12/3/19 10:48 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Wed., Dec. 4, 2019, 01:20 Tapani Pälli, > wrote: > > Hi; > > On 12/4/19 2:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > >

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On 2019-12-04 at 18:54, Dylan Baker wrote: > Quoting Kristian Høgsberg (2019-12-04 10:43:46) > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:31 AM Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 9:48 AM Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:39 PM Marek Olšák wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

[Mesa-dev] [ANNOUNCE] mesa 19.2.7

Hi list, Mesa 19.2.7 is now available. This is a regularly scheduled release. Things look slow, but this is only one week's worth of changes, so its actually a pretty big release for being this far in the cycle. radv makes up the majority of the changes, but there's also changes for gallium,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeonsi: Add support for midstream bitrate change in encoder

On 2019-12-02 11:30 p.m., Satyajit Sahu wrote: Added support for bitrate change in between encoding. Signed-off-by: Satyajit Sahu diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_vce.c b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/radeon_vce.c index 84d3c1e2fa4..7d7a2fa4eb3 100644 ---

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: remove second prototype of brw_batch_reloc

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h | 5 - 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.h index 91720dad5b4..137158f168a 100644 ---

[Mesa-dev] Projects for 2020's GSoC?

Greetings I was skimming through X.Org's project proposals for next year's GSoC/EVoC. I'd like to learn more about mesa related projects because/albeit it is a totally new domain for me! I've noticed some of the listed projects have already been developed. For example, the DriConf project has in

Re: [Mesa-dev] CVE-2019-19520: Local privilege escalation via xlock

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:59:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 13:42, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > Until very recently OpenBSD built xlockmore against Mesa. xlock is > > setgid auth. As described by Qualys in their advisory > >

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] util: unbreak endian detection on OpenBSD

Since cbee1bfb34274668a05995b9d4c78ddec9e5ea4c endian.h is unconditionally used if available. glibc has byte order defines with two leading underscores. OpenBSD has private defines with a single leading underscore in machine/endian.h and public defines in endian.h with no underscore. The code

[Mesa-dev] CVE-2019-19520: Local privilege escalation via xlock

Until very recently OpenBSD built xlockmore against Mesa. xlock is setgid auth. As described by Qualys in their advisory https://marc.info/?l=oss-security=157549260013521=2 "CVE-2019-19520: Local privilege escalation via xlock" the setuid check in the loader for LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH does not

Re: [Mesa-dev] CVE-2019-19520: Local privilege escalation via xlock

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 13:42, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > Until very recently OpenBSD built xlockmore against Mesa. xlock is > setgid auth. As described by Qualys in their advisory > https://marc.info/?l=oss-security=157549260013521=2 > "CVE-2019-19520: Local privilege escalation via xlock" > the

Re: [Mesa-dev] Remove classic drivers or fork src/mesa for gallium?

On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 4:39:15 PM PST Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > Here are 2 proposals to simplify and better optimize the GL->Gallium > translation. > > 1) Move classic drivers to a fork of Mesa, and remove them from master. > Classic drivers won't share any code with master. glvnd will