https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
Timothy Arceri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
Tapani Pälli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lem...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #9 from Tapani Pälli ---
(In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #8)
> Iirc the mingw + autoconf build was dropped. So we might want to 'sync' with
> the autoconf build. The latter currently requires gcc 4.2, whist
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #10 from Jose Fonseca ---
(In reply to Brian Paul from comment #7)
> I routinely use MinGW 4.6.3:
>
> $ i686-w64-mingw32-g++ --version
> i686-w64-mingw32-g++ (GCC) 4.6.3
If this version is still widely used,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #11 from Brian Paul ---
(In reply to Jose Fonseca from comment #10)
> (In reply to Brian Paul from comment #7)
> > I routinely use MinGW 4.6.3:
> >
> > $ i686-w64-mingw32-g++ --version
> > i686-w64-mingw32-g++
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #6 from Tapani Pälli ---
(In reply to Vinson Lee from comment #5)
> mesa: ca2e16d26ec46e604c76ab72d3ec14a7a8643cc8 (master 11.1.0-devel)
>
> Build is still failing on older versions on MinGW. This error occurs with
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #8 from Emil Velikov ---
Iirc the mingw + autoconf build was dropped. So we might want to 'sync' with
the autoconf build. The latter currently requires gcc 4.2, whist 4.6 is
recommended.
Although as Brian
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #7 from Brian Paul ---
(In reply to Tapani Pälli from comment #6)
> (In reply to Vinson Lee from comment #5)
> > mesa: ca2e16d26ec46e604c76ab72d3ec14a7a8643cc8 (master 11.1.0-devel)
> >
> > Build is still failing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
Vinson Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
Tapani Pälli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
Bug ID: 92183
Summary: linker.cpp:3187:46: error: ‘strtok_r’ was not declared
in this scope
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #2 from Ilia Mirkin ---
strtok isn't threadsafe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #1 from Tapani Pälli ---
it seems strtok_s would be the windows equivalent:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ftsafwz3.aspx
I can make a patch that uses strtok_s when on windows or maybe just go for
regular
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92183
--- Comment #3 from Tapani Pälli ---
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #2)
> strtok isn't threadsafe
right I'll go for strtok_s, I was just wondering if the occurences of strtok
should be converted to mesa_strtok which
14 matches
Mail list logo