On Sep 28, 2016 12:10 PM, "Anuj Phogat" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Anuj Phogat
wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> >> This seems odd... When can it even happen that we have
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> This seems odd... When can it even happen that we have persample_dispatch
>> set in wm_surface_state and have only one sample? Does this
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This seems odd... When can it even happen that we have persample_dispatch
> set in wm_surface_state and have only one sample? Does this fix a test
> case?
>
No, It just fixes a simulator warning. It's recommended in
This seems odd... When can it even happen that we have persample_dispatch
set in wm_surface_state and have only one sample? Does this fix a test
case?
On Sep 21, 2016 9:14 PM, "Anuj Phogat" wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat
> ---
>
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat
---
src/intel/vulkan/gen7_pipeline.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/gen7_pipeline.c b/src/intel/vulkan/gen7_pipeline.c
index 878308b..5150ef9 100644
--- a/src/intel/vulkan/gen7_pipeline.c