On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 12:17 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 21:22 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Timothy Arceri
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:49 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This seems a
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 21:22 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Timothy Arceri
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:49 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
> > >
> > > This seems a little dubious... why restrict it to gen7+?
> >
> > Because if we don't switch to using nir
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:49 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> This seems a little dubious... why restrict it to gen7+?
>
> Because if we don't switch to using nir_lower_indirect_derefs() then
> lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign() makes a big
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:49 -0400, Connor Abbott wrote:
> This seems a little dubious... why restrict it to gen7+?
Because if we don't switch to using nir_lower_indirect_derefs() then
lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign() makes a big mess before we get to
unrolling. I was getting piglit regression
This seems a little dubious... why restrict it to gen7+? And why only
scalar? This pass assumes SSA, but so do many other passes in core NIR
that we also run in nir_optimize(), so that shouldn't be a problem.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
> ---
> src/compiler/glsl/glsl_p
---
src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser_extras.cpp | 12 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_compiler.c | 42 +++-
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_nir.c | 23 +
3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_pars
