Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-03-15 04:52:41)
> On Tuesday, 2018-03-13 11:52:48 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Currently each driver specifies it's own version, and core libdrm
> > specifies a version. In the most common case this is fine, since there
> > will be exactly one libdrm installed on a
On Tuesday, 2018-03-13 11:52:48 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Currently each driver specifies it's own version, and core libdrm
> specifies a version. In the most common case this is fine, since there
> will be exactly one libdrm installed on a system, but if there are more
> than one it's possible
Quoting Ilia Mirkin (2018-03-13 12:15:08)
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
> > On 13 March 2018 at 18:52, Dylan Baker wrote:
> >> Currently each driver specifies it's own version, and core libdrm
> >> specifies a version. In
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 at 18:52, Dylan Baker wrote:
>> Currently each driver specifies it's own version, and core libdrm
>> specifies a version. In the most common case this is fine, since there
>>
On 13 March 2018 at 18:52, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Currently each driver specifies it's own version, and core libdrm
> specifies a version. In the most common case this is fine, since there
> will be exactly one libdrm installed on a system, but if there are more
> than one it's
Currently each driver specifies it's own version, and core libdrm
specifies a version. In the most common case this is fine, since there
will be exactly one libdrm installed on a system, but if there are more
than one it's possible that mesa will be linked against different
versions of libdrm.