Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if it's non-zero
Sounds good On April 23, 2018 18:07:19 Nanley Cherywrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:18:54AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message > rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a very > nice clean-up. > To make sure we're on the same page, I made an error in using the term clear address, because the code only checks part of it (the bo)? What do you think of this new commit message? i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if clear_bo is non-NULL We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by returning zero for the clear color bo and offset. v2: Fix usage of "clear address" in commit message (Jason). > Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand > Thanks! -Nanley > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Nanley Chery wrote: > > > We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by > > returning zero for the clear address. > > --- > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++--- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > index 06f739faf61..3c70dbcc110 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > > struct brw_bo *aux_bo = NULL; > > struct isl_surf *aux_surf = NULL; > > uint64_t aux_offset = 0; > > + struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > > + uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > > struct intel_miptree_aux_buffer *aux_buf = > > intel_miptree_get_aux_buffer(mt); > > > > if (aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) { > > @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > >/* We only really need a clear color if we also have an auxiliary > > * surface. Without one, it does nothing. > > */ > > + clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > > + clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; > >clear_color = mt->fast_clear_color; > > } > > > > @@ -173,15 +177,6 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > > brw->isl_dev.ss.align, > > surf_offset); > > > > - bool use_clear_address = devinfo->gen >= 10 && aux_surf; > > - > > - struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > > - uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > > - if (use_clear_address) { > > - clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > > - clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; > > - } > > - > > isl_surf_fill_state(>isl_dev, state, .surf = , .view = > > , > > .address = brw_state_reloc(>batch, > >*surf_offset + > > brw->isl_dev.ss.addr_offset, > > @@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > > .aux_address = aux_offset, > > .mocs = brw_get_bo_mocs(devinfo, mt->bo), > > .clear_color = clear_color, > > - .use_clear_address = use_clear_address, > > + .use_clear_address = clear_bo != NULL, > > .clear_address = clear_offset, > > .x_offset_sa = tile_x, .y_offset_sa = tile_y); > > if (aux_surf) { > > @@ -222,7 +217,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > >} > > } > > > > - if (use_clear_address) { > > + if (clear_bo != NULL) { > >/* Make sure the offset is aligned with a cacheline. */ > >assert((clear_offset & 0x3f) == 0); > >uint32_t *clear_address = > > -- > > 2.16.2 > > > > ___ > > mesa-dev mailing list > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > > ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if it's non-zero
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:18:54AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message > rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a very > nice clean-up. > To make sure we're on the same page, I made an error in using the term clear address, because the code only checks part of it (the bo)? What do you think of this new commit message? i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if clear_bo is non-NULL We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by returning zero for the clear color bo and offset. v2: Fix usage of "clear address" in commit message (Jason). > Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand> Thanks! -Nanley > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Nanley Chery wrote: > > > We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by > > returning zero for the clear address. > > --- > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++--- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > index 06f739faf61..3c70dbcc110 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > > struct brw_bo *aux_bo = NULL; > > struct isl_surf *aux_surf = NULL; > > uint64_t aux_offset = 0; > > + struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > > + uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > > struct intel_miptree_aux_buffer *aux_buf = > > intel_miptree_get_aux_buffer(mt); > > > > if (aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) { > > @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > >/* We only really need a clear color if we also have an auxiliary > > * surface. Without one, it does nothing. > > */ > > + clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > > + clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; > >clear_color = mt->fast_clear_color; > > } > > > > @@ -173,15 +177,6 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > > brw->isl_dev.ss.align, > > surf_offset); > > > > - bool use_clear_address = devinfo->gen >= 10 && aux_surf; > > - > > - struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > > - uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > > - if (use_clear_address) { > > - clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > > - clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; > > - } > > - > > isl_surf_fill_state(>isl_dev, state, .surf = , .view = > > , > > .address = brw_state_reloc(>batch, > >*surf_offset + > > brw->isl_dev.ss.addr_offset, > > @@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > > .aux_address = aux_offset, > > .mocs = brw_get_bo_mocs(devinfo, mt->bo), > > .clear_color = clear_color, > > - .use_clear_address = use_clear_address, > > + .use_clear_address = clear_bo != NULL, > > .clear_address = clear_offset, > > .x_offset_sa = tile_x, .y_offset_sa = tile_y); > > if (aux_surf) { > > @@ -222,7 +217,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > >} > > } > > > > - if (use_clear_address) { > > + if (clear_bo != NULL) { > >/* Make sure the offset is aligned with a cacheline. */ > >assert((clear_offset & 0x3f) == 0); > >uint32_t *clear_address = > > -- > > 2.16.2 > > > > ___ > > mesa-dev mailing list > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > > ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if it's non-zero
I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a very nice clean-up. Reviewed-by: Jason EkstrandOn Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Nanley Chery wrote: > We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by > returning zero for the clear address. > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > index 06f739faf61..3c70dbcc110 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > struct brw_bo *aux_bo = NULL; > struct isl_surf *aux_surf = NULL; > uint64_t aux_offset = 0; > + struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > + uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > struct intel_miptree_aux_buffer *aux_buf = > intel_miptree_get_aux_buffer(mt); > > if (aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) { > @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, >/* We only really need a clear color if we also have an auxiliary > * surface. Without one, it does nothing. > */ > + clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > + clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; >clear_color = mt->fast_clear_color; > } > > @@ -173,15 +177,6 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > brw->isl_dev.ss.align, > surf_offset); > > - bool use_clear_address = devinfo->gen >= 10 && aux_surf; > - > - struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > - uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > - if (use_clear_address) { > - clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > - clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; > - } > - > isl_surf_fill_state(>isl_dev, state, .surf = , .view = > , > .address = brw_state_reloc(>batch, >*surf_offset + > brw->isl_dev.ss.addr_offset, > @@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > .aux_address = aux_offset, > .mocs = brw_get_bo_mocs(devinfo, mt->bo), > .clear_color = clear_color, > - .use_clear_address = use_clear_address, > + .use_clear_address = clear_bo != NULL, > .clear_address = clear_offset, > .x_offset_sa = tile_x, .y_offset_sa = tile_y); > if (aux_surf) { > @@ -222,7 +217,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, >} > } > > - if (use_clear_address) { > + if (clear_bo != NULL) { >/* Make sure the offset is aligned with a cacheline. */ >assert((clear_offset & 0x3f) == 0); >uint32_t *clear_address = > -- > 2.16.2 > > ___ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if it's non-zero
Looks like this is the last patch in the series that is only cleaning up the mess I left behind by adding the clear color bo. Thanks for that. Reviewed-by: Rafael AntognolliOn Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote: > We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by > returning zero for the clear address. > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > index 06f739faf61..3c70dbcc110 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > struct brw_bo *aux_bo = NULL; > struct isl_surf *aux_surf = NULL; > uint64_t aux_offset = 0; > + struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > + uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > struct intel_miptree_aux_buffer *aux_buf = > intel_miptree_get_aux_buffer(mt); > > if (aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) { > @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, >/* We only really need a clear color if we also have an auxiliary > * surface. Without one, it does nothing. > */ > + clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > + clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; >clear_color = mt->fast_clear_color; > } > > @@ -173,15 +177,6 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > brw->isl_dev.ss.align, > surf_offset); > > - bool use_clear_address = devinfo->gen >= 10 && aux_surf; > - > - struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; > - uint32_t clear_offset = 0; > - if (use_clear_address) { > - clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; > - clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; > - } > - > isl_surf_fill_state(>isl_dev, state, .surf = , .view = , > .address = brw_state_reloc(>batch, >*surf_offset + > brw->isl_dev.ss.addr_offset, > @@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, > .aux_address = aux_offset, > .mocs = brw_get_bo_mocs(devinfo, mt->bo), > .clear_color = clear_color, > - .use_clear_address = use_clear_address, > + .use_clear_address = clear_bo != NULL, > .clear_address = clear_offset, > .x_offset_sa = tile_x, .y_offset_sa = tile_y); > if (aux_surf) { > @@ -222,7 +217,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, >} > } > > - if (use_clear_address) { > + if (clear_bo != NULL) { >/* Make sure the offset is aligned with a cacheline. */ >assert((clear_offset & 0x3f) == 0); >uint32_t *clear_address = > -- > 2.16.2 > > ___ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if it's non-zero
We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by returning zero for the clear address. --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c index 06f739faf61..3c70dbcc110 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, struct brw_bo *aux_bo = NULL; struct isl_surf *aux_surf = NULL; uint64_t aux_offset = 0; + struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; + uint32_t clear_offset = 0; struct intel_miptree_aux_buffer *aux_buf = intel_miptree_get_aux_buffer(mt); if (aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) { @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, /* We only really need a clear color if we also have an auxiliary * surface. Without one, it does nothing. */ + clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; + clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; clear_color = mt->fast_clear_color; } @@ -173,15 +177,6 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, brw->isl_dev.ss.align, surf_offset); - bool use_clear_address = devinfo->gen >= 10 && aux_surf; - - struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL; - uint32_t clear_offset = 0; - if (use_clear_address) { - clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo; - clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset; - } - isl_surf_fill_state(>isl_dev, state, .surf = , .view = , .address = brw_state_reloc(>batch, *surf_offset + brw->isl_dev.ss.addr_offset, @@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, .aux_address = aux_offset, .mocs = brw_get_bo_mocs(devinfo, mt->bo), .clear_color = clear_color, - .use_clear_address = use_clear_address, + .use_clear_address = clear_bo != NULL, .clear_address = clear_offset, .x_offset_sa = tile_x, .y_offset_sa = tile_y); if (aux_surf) { @@ -222,7 +217,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw, } } - if (use_clear_address) { + if (clear_bo != NULL) { /* Make sure the offset is aligned with a cacheline. */ assert((clear_offset & 0x3f) == 0); uint32_t *clear_address = -- 2.16.2 ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev