On 19 October 2016 at 18:51, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2016, 13:55:16 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
>> On 16 October 2016 at 01:20, Tobias Droste wrote:
>> > No need for an additional function here.
>> > Use the same style for LLVM checks as the other drivers
>> > (e.g. r300, l
Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2016, 13:55:16 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
> On 16 October 2016 at 01:20, Tobias Droste wrote:
> > No need for an additional function here.
> > Use the same style for LLVM checks as the other drivers
> > (e.g. r300, llvmpipe) that don't need a load of other checks.
> > Inst
On 16 October 2016 at 01:20, Tobias Droste wrote:
> No need for an additional function here.
> Use the same style for LLVM checks as the other drivers
> (e.g. r300, llvmpipe) that don't need a load of other checks.
> Instead of open conding the LLVM version check, use the
> function used by other
No need for an additional function here.
Use the same style for LLVM checks as the other drivers
(e.g. r300, llvmpipe) that don't need a load of other checks.
Instead of open conding the LLVM version check, use the
function used by other drivers.
"enable_gallium_llvm" is checked by gallium_require
