Pushed. Thanks and welcome to Mesa!
On April 14, 2018 12:26:18 Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
What driver is hitting this path? The !supports_ints path isn't used to my
knowledge so if some driver has started using it, they're
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Erico Nunes wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:30 AM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > On April 14, 2018 12:43:35 Connor Abbott wrote:
> > I think that it's probably impractical to use this path, and
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:30 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On April 14, 2018 12:43:35 Connor Abbott wrote:
> I think that it's probably impractical to use this path, and we should
> probably delete it. There are just too many optimizations, e.g. in
>
On April 14, 2018 12:43:35 Connor Abbott wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Erico Nunes wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
What driver is
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Erico Nunes wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
>>
>> What driver is hitting this path? The !supports_ints path isn't used to my
>>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
>
> What driver is hitting this path? The !supports_ints path isn't used to my
> knowledge so if some driver has started using it, they're liable to find
> more bugs
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
What driver is hitting this path? The !supports_ints path isn't used to my
knowledge so if some driver has started using it, they're liable to find
more bugs than just this one. :-)
On April 14, 2018 12:16:48 Erico Nunes