On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 15:02 +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 04:26 -0700, José Fonseca wrote:
When pushing a new branch only the last commit message email gets sent,
but there is one earlier patch submitted to the gallium-llvmpipe branch
which I'd like to draw your attention
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:25 -0700, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:09 -0700, Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
I found one other problem in the way we use 4 x 8bit color formats:
sometimes we interpret them as arithmetically coded in an unsigned (e.g
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:21 -0700, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 15:02 +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 04:26 -0700, José Fonseca wrote:
When pushing a new branch only the last commit message email gets sent,
but there is one earlier patch submitted to the
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 07:02 -0700, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 04:26 -0700, José Fonseca wrote:
When pushing a new branch only the last commit message email gets sent,
but there is one earlier patch submitted to the gallium-llvmpipe branch
which I'd like to draw your attention
José Fonseca pisze:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:09 -0700, Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
I found one other problem in the way we use 4 x 8bit color formats:
sometimes we interpret them as arithmetically coded in an unsigned (e.g
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_tile.c when
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 23:33, Brian Paulbri...@vmware.com wrote:
RALOVICH wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate the following patches from master for
inclusion in the 7.5 branch:
ddef7dc87b2001fbe117ee5f24a0c645ee95a03c - this fixes the intel
driver context leak
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 17:36 +0200, Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:09 -0700, Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
I found one other problem in the way we use 4 x 8bit color formats:
sometimes we interpret them as arithmetically coded in an
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:25 +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:09 -0700, Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
I found one other problem in the way we use 4 x 8bit color formats:
sometimes we interpret them as arithmetically coded in an unsigned (e.g
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:30 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
I found one other problem in the way we use 4 x 8bit color formats:
sometimes we interpret them as arithmetically coded in an unsigned (e.g
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_tile.c when reading/writing
José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:30 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Michał Król wrote:
José Fonseca pisze:
I found one other problem in the way we use 4 x 8bit color formats:
sometimes we interpret them as arithmetically coded in an unsigned (e.g
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_tile.c when
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22880
Ruslan b7.10110...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22880
--- Comment #3 from JasonErickson viperja...@gmail.com 2009-07-28 12:18:26
PST ---
I looked at your link and was hoping a pre-compiled dll or a VC project
existed. Unfortunately not. Do you have a working windows DLL version?
--
Signed-off-by: Pauli Nieminen suok...@gmail.com
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_common.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_common.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_common.c
index dde615a..7f503a9 100644
---
Seems to work well on rv620; gets rid of corruption outside the window
when dragging an active program.
-Original Message-
From: Pauli Nieminen [mailto:suok...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:29 PM
To: mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Mesa3d-dev] [PATCH] radeon:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22880
--- Comment #5 from JasonErickson viperja...@gmail.com 2009-07-28 16:37:04
PST ---
Yeah wasnt hard to compile but for the life of me I cant get Mesa3D to actually
run the code in the DLL. I am running it in windows on a virtual machine.
Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:10:43AM -0600, tom fogal wrote:
Hrm. I would argue that both places should read something more like:
#if C99 is supported
# include stdint.h
#else
/* some typedefs */
#endif
Or perhaps something more
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:14:04PM -0600, tom fogal wrote:
Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:10:43AM -0600, tom fogal wrote:
Hrm. I would argue that both places should read something more like:
#if C99 is supported
# include stdint.h
#else
17 matches
Mail list logo
