On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:51 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > Module: Mesa
> > Branch: master
> > Commit: 1baaf111c8c42ed7f7218c46038f32eb51b9c6eb
> > URL:
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=1baaf111c8c42ed7f7218c46038f3
Yikes, looks like something bad happened here.
git seems to have changed on me and this looks like it pushed master
onto the 7.5 branch.
How can we reset this on fdo ?
Alan.
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 07:55 -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> URL:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/comm
e forced
> mesa_7_5_branch back to the last merge of it into master, hopefully
> nothing got lost, if anybody have pushed anything after
> 5b3428d7453eec8e8a5344e22113774dea1dc456 to mesa_7_5_branch please push
> again.
>
> Cheers Jakob.
>
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > URL:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 16:12 +0530, Kamalneet Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got link errors while building gallium-mesa-7.4 branch with "make
> linux-llvm". The attached patch fixes it.
>
> But I wonder which is the right branch for running mesa with llvm,
> preferably with softpipe. Can someone please
ior to a swap.
I've committed this already to the gallium-mesa-7.4 branch, but any
comments appreciated before I push to the master branch?
Thanks,
Alan.
commit b163d4f9ee2ab4d54daf7c17c097cae51c9c6db2
Author: Alan Hourihane
Date: Thu Feb 19 18:39:08 2009 +
glx: add support for
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 16:34 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Brian Paul
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > KwangYul Seo wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I want to know the current status of EGL in Mesa. Mesa in the git
> >> repository seems to have src/egl, but I can't find
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 17:18 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 17:02:27 +0100, Jens Stroebel wrote:
>
> > Hello all :)
> >
> > While trying to track the mesa_7_0_branch of mesa, I noticed my build
> > failing with:
> >
> >
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 17:18 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 17:02:27 +0100, Jens Stroebel wrote:
>
> > Hello all :)
> >
> > While trying to track the mesa_7_0_branch of mesa, I noticed my build
> > failing with:
> >
> >
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:15 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On 9/20/07, José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/19/07, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:20:49AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > > > However, when loaded, references to __glXFreeContext
Ian,
This bit of the patch is broken
case GL_TEXTURE_3D:
- {
-const struct gl_texture_unit *texUnit;
-texUnit = &ctx->Texture.Unit[ctx->Texture.CurrentUnit];
-return (texUnit->Enabled & TEXTURE_3D_BIT) ? GL_TRUE :
GL_FALSE;
- }
+
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 09:05 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 4/22/07, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 16:06 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> > > I've uploaded a second release candidate: http://www.mesa3d.org/beta/
>
> > I think it would be useful in general, but in part
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 13:31 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 18:52 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >
> > Seems like a good solution to me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Although should we try and open "libGL.so" first, and then
> > "li
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 18:11 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I think we need to get to the bottom of this problem, as it keeps
> getting more annoying, e.g. now with AIGLX it's not always easy to tell
> whether direct rendering is being used, and when it's not, bugs may take
> down the server instead
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 18:30 +0200, Agustin Rubio Mingorance wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a PC with an Intel GM855 graphic card.
> I've been able to get dualhead and direct rendering
> in one of the screens, but I can't get it in both of them.
>
> ¿What should I do in order to get dri in dualhead m
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 14:23 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > The problem here is batchbuffers.
> > >
> > > Due to rotation being able to shuffle memory around it wasn't possible to
> > &
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 11:49 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:55 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:06:51PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > The open source driver isn't doing some important things that can be
> > >
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:55 +0200, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:06:51PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > The open source driver isn't doing some important things that can be
> > done to improve memory bandwidth usage. 5x is more than I expected, but
> > it's not unbelievable.
>
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 15:52 -0800, Johnson, Charles F wrote:
> I'm down to trying to build the i915_dri driver and am getting:
>
> gcc -c -I. -I../../../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common -Iserver
> -I../../../../../../drm/shared-core -I../../../../../include
> -I../../../../../include/GL/interna
Anyone objections to removing the very old i830 code ??
i.e.
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i830 ??
Alan.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that m
19 matches
Mail list logo