On 11.01.2010 16:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:50 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> On 11.01.2010 16:42, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:33 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Hi,
I'll plan to merge gallium-noconstbuf today. It's a pretty simp
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:50 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> On 11.01.2010 16:42, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:33 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'll plan to merge gallium-noconstbuf today. It's a pretty simple API
> >> change, so things should continue
On 11.01.2010 16:42, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:33 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'll plan to merge gallium-noconstbuf today. It's a pretty simple API
>> change, so things should continue to run :-).
>
> Roland,
>
> Before you do this, can you make sure that
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:33 -0800, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll plan to merge gallium-noconstbuf today. It's a pretty simple API
> change, so things should continue to run :-).
Roland,
Before you do this, can you make sure that the set_constant_buffer()
entrypoint is properly documen
Hi,
I'll plan to merge gallium-noconstbuf today. It's a pretty simple API
change, so things should continue to run :-).
Roland
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizo
