On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:41 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:12:25PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:05 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 15.00, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 05:44 -0800, Maciej Cencora wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:59 AM, José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:41 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:12:25PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:05 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 15.00, José Fonseca
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 09:17 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:59 AM, José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:41 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:12:25PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:05 -0800, Jakob
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 18:43 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
Gallium3D currently builds on Linux userland (gcc), Windows user-space
(MSVC, MinGW, and MinGW cross-compilers) and Windows kernel-space (MSVC
only unfortunately). Mesa3D/Gallium3D scons build system supports all
those combinations,
On środa, 11 lutego 2009 00:47:52 Brian Paul wrote:
OK, the merge is done and pushed. Seems to have gone OK.
Please report any problems found and we'll try to fix them ASAP.
-Brian
The GLEW library isn't build so all progs/demos builds fail. One have to
manually enter the src/glew
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 05:44 -0800, Maciej Cencora wrote:
On środa, 11 lutego 2009 00:47:52 Brian Paul wrote:
OK, the merge is done and pushed. Seems to have gone OK.
Please report any problems found and we'll try to fix them ASAP.
-Brian
The GLEW library isn't build so all
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:05 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 15.00, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 05:44 -0800, Maciej Cencora wrote:
On środa, 11 lutego 2009 00:47:52 Brian Paul wrote:
OK, the merge is done and pushed. Seems to have gone OK.
Please
On piątek, 13 lutego 2009 15:00:25 José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 05:44 -0800, Maciej Cencora wrote:
On środa, 11 lutego 2009 00:47:52 Brian Paul wrote:
OK, the merge is done and pushed. Seems to have gone OK.
Please report any problems found and we'll try to fix them ASAP.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:12:25PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:05 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 15.00, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 05:44 -0800, Maciej Cencora wrote:
On środa, 11 lutego 2009 00:47:52 Brian Paul wrote:
OK,
On piątek, 13 lutego 2009 15:41:49 Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:12:25PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 06:05 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 13 feb 2009, at 15.00, José Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 05:44 -0800, Maciej Cencora wrote:
On
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com wrote:
On piątek, 13 lutego 2009 15:41:49 Dan Nicholson wrote:
Since GLEW is only needed with the GLUT demos, wouldn't this be better?
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 549ca90..36b5859 100644
---
Maciej Cencora wrote:
Actually demos don't build without your patches. I run make clean but it
doesn't remove most of lib/ files so the progs/demos build succeed at first.
Can you check that Mesa master/head is OK now?
What's the deal with all those build systems? Can't we agree on one and
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com wrote:
Head is OK now. What about make clean? Shouldn't it delete all files from lib/
directory?
It never has before. You can run 'make realclean' if you want to
obliterate everything.
--
Dan
On 08:58 Fri 13 Feb , Brian Paul wrote:
Maciej Cencora wrote:
What's the deal with all those build systems? Can't we agree on one and
drop
the rest?
We'll probably get there one day.
I'm still pretty attached to the old static config file system. I've
never been much of a fan
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
My understanding is that MinGW runs nicely on Windows systems and will
deal with autotools just fine. Is the requirement to build using the
Microsoft compilers rather than to build and run on Windows? If so, that
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 09:57 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 08:58 Fri 13 Feb , Brian Paul wrote:
Maciej Cencora wrote:
What's the deal with all those build systems? Can't we agree on one and
drop
the rest?
We'll probably get there one day.
I'm still pretty attached to
Gallium3D currently builds on Linux userland (gcc), Windows user-space
(MSVC, MinGW, and MinGW cross-compilers) and Windows kernel-space (MSVC
only unfortunately). Mesa3D/Gallium3D scons build system supports all
those combinations, *today*.
Jose it supports building, I think Donnie's point
2009/2/10 Anders Juel Jensen andersjjen...@gmail.com:
PS.: Oh, http://wiki.x.org/wiki/Development/git just became obsolete. Can
someone knowledgable also give quick instructions on how to actually run
gallium there?
I can update the page (and others), as soon as I know...
...what would be
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Ian Romanick
i...@paranormal-entertainment.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Jerome commented out the DRI_DIRS part and some other stuff in the
gallium branch and that's been merged in. I was going to take a look
at it a little later,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 15:53, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Jerome commented out the DRI_DIRS part and some other stuff in the
gallium branch and
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 15:53, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Jerome commented out the DRI_DIRS part and some other stuff
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:27 -0800, Brian Paul wrote:
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 15:53, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 17:27, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 15:53, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 17:27, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Stephane Marchesin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 15:53, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jerome Glisse gli...@freedesktop.org
wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:47 -0800, Dan Nicholson
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and classic
drivers from
the same tree at the same time?
or is distro life
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 04:21 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and classic
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 11:24 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To work
On 10 feb 2009, at 13.39, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 04:21 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 05:41 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 13.39, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 04:21 -0800, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and classic
drivers from
the same tree at the same
On 12:39 Tue 10 Feb , Keith Whitwell wrote:
I think I'd prefer either building all or none of the drivers in each
case, rather than trying to tweak things up or down driver by driver.
Given Dave's preference for building both legacy + gallium drivers from
the existing linux-dri-*
On 10 feb 2009, at 16.46, Brian Paul wrote:
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 16.46, Brian Paul wrote:
Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
On 10 feb 2009, at 08.17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
In terms of the build system, we'll
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM,
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
BTW everyone, I'm planning on merging gallium-master-merge to master this
afternoon.
Then I'll merge in the latest gallium-0.2 changes to get those. (OR, should
I merge gallium-0.2 into gallium-master-merge first? Git
OK, the merge is done and pushed. Seems to have gone OK.
Please report any problems found and we'll try to fix them ASAP.
-Brian
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:10 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:22, Ian Romanick
i...@paranormal-entertainment.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:10 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Ian Romanick
i...@paranormal-entertainment.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To work out the kinks I'll be pushing a short term
gallium-master-merge branch for
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To work out the kinks I'll be pushing a short term
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
In terms of the build system, we'll initially default to the non-gallium
build. To build with gallium I'll add some new configs like
'linux-gallium'.
I haven't tried building gallium at all, but is there interest in
adding
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:24 -0800, Brian Paul wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To work
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
In terms of the build system, we'll initially default to the non-gallium
build. To build with gallium I'll add some new configs like
'linux-gallium'.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
In terms of the build system, we'll initially default to the non-gallium
build. To build with gallium
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
In terms of the build system, we'll initially default to the non-gallium
build. To build with gallium I'll add some new configs
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 13:10 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote:
In terms of the build system, we'll
We can do either:
- have some new build targets, like linux-gallium-dri etc, that
build the drivers and put them in mesa/lib/xyz_dri.so
No not the one we'd like.
or
- build both lots of drivers, and put the gallium ones in a new
directory, like mesa/lib/gallium/xyz_dri.so
I'd suspect
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To work out the kinks I'll be pushing a short term
Corbin Simpson wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Over the next day or so we're going to merge the gallium-0.2 branch to
master. master and gallium-0.2 are both development branches and
keeping the core Mesa work synced between them is a bit of PITA.
To work out the kinks I'll be pushing a short
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:57 +0100, Anders Juel Jensen wrote:
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:15:44 Keith Whitwell wrote:
but is it possible to build both gallium drivers and classic drivers from
the same tree at the same time?
or is distro life going to be made shit yet again.
55 matches
Mail list logo
