On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 09:40 -0800, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Keith Whitwell writes:
>
> > It's a very rare application that can render half a frame to one sized
> > framebuffer and the other half to another and expect to have a meaningful
> > result.
> >
> > It's also incredibly difficult to wri
Keith Whitwell writes:
> It's a very rare application that can render half a frame to one sized
> framebuffer and the other half to another and expect to have a meaningful
> result.
>
> It's also incredibly difficult to write a driver that produces any sensible
> result when the render-target
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:40 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> It's a very rare application that can render half a frame to one sized
>> framebuffer and the other half to another and expect to have a
>> meaningful result.
>>
>> It's also incredibly difficult to write a driver th
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:40 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> It's a very rare application that can render half a frame to one sized
> framebuffer and the other half to another and expect to have a
> meaningful result.
>
> It's also incredibly difficult to write a driver that produces any
> sensible
net
Subject: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] [mesa patch 1/3] dri2: Event driven buffer validation.
> > When the invalidate event is available, IMO the buffers should also only
> > be invalidated after a buffer swap / front buffer flush, not 'in the
> > middle of a frame'.
> >
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 13:33 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Michel Dänzer writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 00:10 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Michel Dänzer writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 23:01 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> >> When a buffer invalidation event is recei
Michel Dänzer writes:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 00:10 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Michel Dänzer writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 23:01 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> >> When a buffer invalidation event is received from the X server, the
>> >> "invalidate" hook of the DRI2 flush exte
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 00:10 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Michel Dänzer writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 23:01 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> When a buffer invalidation event is received from the X server, the
> >> "invalidate" hook of the DRI2 flush extension is executed: A generic
>
Michel Dänzer writes:
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 23:01 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> When a buffer invalidation event is received from the X server, the
>> "invalidate" hook of the DRI2 flush extension is executed: A generic
>> implementation (dri2InvalidateDrawable) is provided that just bumps
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 23:38 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 23:01 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>
> > No effort has been made on preserving backwards compatibility with
> > version 2 of the flush extension, but I think it's acceptable because
> > AFAIK no released stack is ma
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 23:01 +0100, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> When a buffer invalidation event is received from the X server, the
> "invalidate" hook of the DRI2 flush extension is executed: A generic
> implementation (dri2InvalidateDrawable) is provided that just bumps
> the "pStamp" sequence numbe
11 matches
Mail list logo
