From: Luca Barbieri [luca.barbi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 22:16
To: Jose Fonseca
Cc: mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] RFC: gallium-format-cleanup branch (was Gallium
format swizzles)
Shouldn't
PIPE_FORMAT_X8B8G8R8_UNORM= 68,
be instead
PIPE_FORMAT_X8B8G8R8_UNORM is being used by mesa. PIPE_FORMAT_R8G8B8X8_UNORM
doesn't exist hence it appears to be unnecessary. So it doesn't make sense to
rename.
How about D3DFMT_X8B8G8R8? That should map to PIPE_FORMAT_R8G8B8X8_UNORM.
BTW, we are also missing D3DFMT_X4R4G4B4,
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 04:27 -0800, Luca Barbieri wrote:
PIPE_FORMAT_X8B8G8R8_UNORM is being used by mesa.
PIPE_FORMAT_R8G8B8X8_UNORM doesn't exist hence it appears to be
unnecessary. So it doesn't make sense to rename.
How about D3DFMT_X8B8G8R8? That should map to
On 03.03.2010 14:07, José Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 04:27 -0800, Luca Barbieri wrote:
PIPE_FORMAT_X8B8G8R8_UNORM is being used by mesa.
PIPE_FORMAT_R8G8B8X8_UNORM doesn't exist hence it appears to be
unnecessary. So it doesn't make sense to rename.
How about D3DFMT_X8B8G8R8? That
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 02:44 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:19 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 09:20 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 06:34 -0800, José Fonseca wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 06:40 -0800, Marek Olšák wrote:
Hi José,
Shouldn't
PIPE_FORMAT_X8B8G8R8_UNORM= 68,
be instead R8G8B8X8_UNORM, which is currently missing, for consistency with:
PIPE_FORMAT_R8G8B8X8_SNORM= 81,
with X8B8G8R8_UNORM perhaps put at the end next to PIPE_FORMAT_A8B8G8R8_UNORM?
