http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10984
Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #
On 2/20/08, Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 03:25 +0900, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2/20/08, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > | Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > |> José
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 03:25 +0900, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2/20/08, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > | Ian Romanick wrote:
> > |> José Fonseca wrote:
> > |> | Microsoft compilers don't support C99 synta
On 2/20/08, Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> | Ian Romanick wrote:
> |> José Fonseca wrote:
> |> | Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> |> | compilers that support C99 syntax are
Brian Paul wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ever since commit bfd5916eafb9a97ad10f1d4a8738e7dcb02e04f4 the
>> architecture specific makefile builds (at least linux-x86 and
>> linux-cell) are completely broken. Jose, could you please fix this?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Whitwell wrote:
| Ian Romanick wrote:
|> José Fonseca wrote:
|> | Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
|> | compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
|> | compiler, but we can't seriously s
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ever since commit bfd5916eafb9a97ad10f1d4a8738e7dcb02e04f4 the
> architecture specific makefile builds (at least linux-x86 and
> linux-cell) are completely broken. Jose, could you please fix this?
I'm using linux-debug jus
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ever since commit bfd5916eafb9a97ad10f1d4a8738e7dcb02e04f4 the
> architecture specific makefile builds (at least linux-x86 and
> linux-cell) are completely broken. Jose, could you please fix this?
>
> Since it is becoming
Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> José Fonseca wrote:
> | Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> | compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
> | compiler, but we can't seriously support windows platfor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
José Fonseca wrote:
| Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
| compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
| compiler, but we can't seriously support windows platform by targeting
| these compilers a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ever since commit bfd5916eafb9a97ad10f1d4a8738e7dcb02e04f4 the
architecture specific makefile builds (at least linux-x86 and
linux-cell) are completely broken. Jose, could you please fix this?
Since it is becoming obvious that the makefile builds are
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11893
Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10984
Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
José Fonseca wrote:
> Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
> compiler, but we can't seriously support windows platform by targeting
> these compilers alone and leave msvc out.
>
> So there is no po
On 2/19/08, Stephane Marchesin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> > compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
> > compiler, but we can't seriously suppor
On 2/19/08, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:56:34PM +0900, José Fonseca wrote:
> > Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> > compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
> > compiler, but we can't seriously su
On 2/19/08, José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
> compiler, but we can't seriously support windows platform by targeting
> these compilers alone and leave
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 07:56:34PM +0900, José Fonseca wrote:
> Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
> compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
> compiler, but we can't seriously support windows platform by targeting
> these compilers alone
Microsoft compilers don't support C99 syntax. The only native windows
compilers that support C99 syntax are mingw32-gcc and Intel C/C++
compiler, but we can't seriously support windows platform by targeting
these compilers alone and leave msvc out.
So there is no point in pretending that C99 synta
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11877
Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14405|0 |1
is obsolete|
20 matches
Mail list logo