Hi,
what do you think about this proposal?
--
Sedat
From dafb5cf87fa3cc0d8dee0ad4d8dbb9e7a9ab4078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:09:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] configure.ac: Simplify check for LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED
---
configure.ac
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:16:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
what do you think about this proposal?
--
Sedat
Makes _a_ _lot_ of sense.
Luc Verhaegen.
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new
Unfortunately, this means to get rid of
$RADEON_CFLAGS
$RADEON_LDFLAGS
in other source files.
As I said I am no autotools expert, but if libdrm_intel does not need
any furher CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, why libdrm_radeon is different?
The benefit of simplifying would mean to have libdrm_{intel,radeon}
