On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Reveman wrote:
> > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
> > drivers I've implemented suppo
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:28 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:04 +0100, David Reveman wrote:
> > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
> > drivers I've implemented support for so far.
>
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 16:25 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Reveman wrote:
>
> > I thought that a call to SwapBuffers would always make the content of
> > the back buffer undefined. So if you want to use CopySubBufferMESA for
> > quickly repa
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 08:40 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> David Reveman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:04 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>David Reveman wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>
David Reveman wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:04 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Reveman wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
David Reveman wrote:
This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
GLX_MESA_c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Reveman wrote:
> I thought that a call to SwapBuffers would always make the content of
> the back buffer undefined. So if you want to use CopySubBufferMESA for
> quickly repainting part of the buffer as the in the spec, you would
> never use Swa
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:04 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Reveman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>David Reveman wrote:
> >>
> >>>This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> >>>GLX_MESA_c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Reveman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>David Reveman wrote:
>>
>>>This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
>>>GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
>>>drivers I've
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Reveman wrote:
> > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
> > drivers I've implemented suppo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Reveman wrote:
> This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
> drivers I've implemented support for so far. I've only tried the intel
> implementation and that se
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:28 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:04 +0100, David Reveman wrote:
> > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
> > drivers I've implemented support for so far.
>
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:04 +0100, David Reveman wrote:
> This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
> GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
> drivers I've implemented support for so far.
It looks like the Radeon drivers could share the Copy(Sub)Buffer
This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for
GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only
drivers I've implemented support for so far. I've only tried the intel
implementation and that seems to be working OK. I've attached a patch
for CVS head and one for 6.4.2.
13 matches
Mail list logo