Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-14 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Reveman wrote: > > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only > > drivers I've implemented suppo

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-14 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:28 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:04 +0100, David Reveman wrote: > > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only > > drivers I've implemented support for so far. >

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-14 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 16:25 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Reveman wrote: > > > I thought that a call to SwapBuffers would always make the content of > > the back buffer undefined. So if you want to use CopySubBufferMESA for > > quickly repa

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-14 Thread David Reveman
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 08:40 +, Keith Whitwell wrote: > David Reveman wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:04 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>Hash: SHA1 > >> > >>David Reveman wrote: > >> > >>>On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > >>

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-14 Thread Keith Whitwell
David Reveman wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:04 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Reveman wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: David Reveman wrote: This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for GLX_MESA_c

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Reveman wrote: > I thought that a call to SwapBuffers would always make the content of > the back buffer undefined. So if you want to use CopySubBufferMESA for > quickly repainting part of the buffer as the in the spec, you would > never use Swa

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 14:04 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Reveman wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > >>David Reveman wrote: > >> > >>>This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > >>>GLX_MESA_c

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Reveman wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: >>David Reveman wrote: >> >>>This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for >>>GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only >>>drivers I've

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:45 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Reveman wrote: > > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only > > drivers I've implemented suppo

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread Ian Romanick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Reveman wrote: > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only > drivers I've implemented support for so far. I've only tried the intel > implementation and that se

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:28 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:04 +0100, David Reveman wrote: > > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only > > drivers I've implemented support for so far. >

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:04 +0100, David Reveman wrote: > This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only > drivers I've implemented support for so far. It looks like the Radeon drivers could share the Copy(Sub)Buffer

[Mesa3d-dev] GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer patches and intel driver issue

2006-03-13 Thread David Reveman
This patch adds direct and indirect rendering support for GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer. Intel, r200 and r300 drivers are the only drivers I've implemented support for so far. I've only tried the intel implementation and that seems to be working OK. I've attached a patch for CVS head and one for 6.4.2.