On Friday 18 May 2007 01:53:53 pm Ian Romanick wrote:
Yeah, that's where Roberto came in :) We used QLALR which is simply
amazing and for those who ever used Bison a lot more convenient than what
we had right now.
http://labs.trolltech.com/page/Projects/Compilers/QLALR
Initially we
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 05:07:08 am Keith Whitwell wrote:
Sounds good.
I've been thinking about LLVM and Mesa a little bit the last few days.
If it can be made to work, it seems like a good way to go. There are a
couple of practical issues that should be taken into account
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 05:07:08 am Keith Whitwell wrote:
Sounds good.
I've been thinking about LLVM and Mesa a little bit the last few days.
If it can be made to work, it seems like a good way to go. There are a
couple of practical issues that should be taken into account
Brian Paul wrote:
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 05:07:08 am Keith Whitwell wrote:
Sounds good.
I've been thinking about LLVM and Mesa a little bit the last few days.
If it can be made to work, it seems like a good way to go. There are a
couple of practical issues that should be
On Monday 21 May 2007 03:11:28 pm Keith Whitwell wrote:
It seems that either the LLVM IR would need some extensions for those
things or the back-end code generator/instruction selector would have to
look for patterns of scalar instructions and figure out where vector ops
should be used.
On Thursday 17 May 2007 05:36:45 pm Keith Whitwell wrote:
I think the Zack/Roberto LLVM tree has done just this. Unfortunately
for this immediate problem, they target a whole new intermediate
representation.
Zack, what tools did you use for the front-end/parser? I've been
looking
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 05:36:45 pm Keith Whitwell wrote:
I think the Zack/Roberto LLVM tree has done just this. Unfortunately
for this immediate problem, they target a whole new intermediate
representation.
Zack, what tools did you use for the front-end/parser? I've been
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 05:36:45 pm Keith Whitwell wrote:
I think the Zack/Roberto LLVM tree has done just this. Unfortunately
for this immediate problem, they target a whole new intermediate
representation.
Zack, what tools did you use for the front-end/parser? I've been
Brian Paul wrote:
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 05:36:45 pm Keith Whitwell wrote:
I think the Zack/Roberto LLVM tree has done just this. Unfortunately
for this immediate problem, they target a whole new intermediate
representation.
Zack, what tools did you use for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zack Rusin wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 05:36:45 pm Keith Whitwell wrote:
I think the Zack/Roberto LLVM tree has done just this. Unfortunately
for this immediate problem, they target a whole new intermediate
representation.
Zack, what tools
On 17/05/07, Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Is there an easy way in this parser generator to change the grammar for
the TXP instruction? Basically, I want it to be invalid to use TXP with
the SHADOWARRAY2D target.
Michael would have to answer that. Michael?
I
Micha? Król wrote:
On 17/05/07, Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Is there an easy way in this parser generator to change the grammar for
the TXP instruction? Basically, I want it to be invalid to use TXP with
the SHADOWARRAY2D target.
Michael would have to answer
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Micha? Król wrote:
On 17/05/07, Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Is there an easy way in this parser generator to change the grammar for
the TXP instruction? Basically, I want it to be invalid to use TXP
with
the SHADOWARRAY2D target.
Michael
Brian Paul wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Micha? Król wrote:
On 17/05/07, Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Is there an easy way in this parser generator to change the grammar for
the TXP instruction? Basically, I want it to be invalid to use TXP
with
the
On 5/16/07, Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Where is the tool to process the .syn files in src/mesa/shader?
Is there an easy way in this parser generator to change the grammar for
the TXP instruction? Basically, I want it to be invalid to
15 matches
Mail list logo
