On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 485836a..a582337 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -28,8 +28,11 @@ AC_PROG_CPP
AC_PROG_CC
AC_PROG_CXX
AC_CHECK_PROGS([MAKE], [gmake make])
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 485836a..a582337 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -28,8 +28,11 @@
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
We could use gcc directly for depends (I have a patch to do it), but:
1. I don't think it would actually help much in terms of rebuilds
since makedepend seems to do a perfectly adequate job of finding the
needed
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
We could use gcc directly for depends (I have a patch to do it), but:
1. I don't think it would actually help much in terms of rebuilds
While keeping up-to-date the nouveau mesa driver (either classic or
gallium), or doing regression testing, the big majority of my rebuilds
resulted in segfaults.
I am not talking about autogen or configure detection. I believe this
also works automatically in other projects and doesn't with mesa,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
While keeping up-to-date the nouveau mesa driver (either classic or
gallium), or doing regression testing, the big majority of my rebuilds
resulted in segfaults.
I am not talking about autogen or configure
