Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] machines: Let u-boot be PREFERRED_PROVIDER for virtual/bootloader

2013-10-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thursday, October 17, 2013, Daiane Angolini wrote: >> >> On 10/16/2013 09:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> Lets play the layer with other BSP layers in distro >> >> >> I think I like your patch, but i don't like your commit log, sorry :( > > > Y

Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] machines: Let u-boot be PREFERRED_PROVIDER for virtual/bootloader

2013-10-17 Thread Khem Raj
On Thursday, October 17, 2013, Daiane Angolini wrote: > On 10/16/2013 09:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> Lets play the layer with other BSP layers in distro >> > > I think I like your patch, but i don't like your commit log, sorry :( Yes there is missing bits, it must have been "lets it ..." neverth

Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] machines: Let u-boot be PREFERRED_PROVIDER for virtual/bootloader

2013-10-17 Thread Daiane Angolini
On 10/16/2013 09:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: Lets play the layer with other BSP layers in distro I think I like your patch, but i don't like your commit log, sorry :( Would you mind to add 1)Why are you making the patch 2)What error it did cause to you? I don't mind if you keep your sentence as

[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH] machines: Let u-boot be PREFERRED_PROVIDER for virtual/bootloader

2013-10-16 Thread Khem Raj
Lets play the layer with other BSP layers in distro Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc | 3 +++ conf/machine/include/mxs-base.inc | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc b/conf/machine/include/imx-base.inc index b5