On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani
d...@pseudoterminal.org wrote:
Sorry, typo. I meant gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf , not
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux. The -asf package contains the
libgstasf.so plugin, which in turn contains the asfdemux element.
Could you point me
On 2014-11-27 13:41, Alexander Shashkevych wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani
d...@pseudoterminal.org wrote:
Sorry, typo. I meant gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf , not
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux. The -asf package contains the
libgstasf.so plugin, which in turn
Sorry, typo. I meant gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf , not
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux. The -asf package contains the
libgstasf.so plugin, which in turn contains the asfdemux element.
Could you point me on gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf package in layers?
I have tried to search across
Sorry, typo. I meant gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf , not
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux. The -asf package contains the
libgstasf.so plugin, which in turn contains the asfdemux element.
This explains why I hadn't found ugly-asfdemux plugin when I did grep
on recipes.
On 2014-11-25 23:22,
Hm, I am not sure how this came to be. Anyway, you are correct that
mpg123 is not part of -ugly, so this entry should be removed.
However, there is a gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux package from
-ugly, which does belong here. Also, I think perhaps we could
move this line from the -full to
Sorry, typo. I meant gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asf , not
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux. The -asf package contains the
libgstasf.so plugin, which in turn contains the asfdemux element.
On 2014-11-25 23:22, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
Hm, I am not sure how this came to be. Anyway, you are
packagegroup-fslc-gstreamer1.0-commercial had a dependencies on
following missing packages:
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-mpg123
gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly-asfdemux
Both of these packages are no longer provided by community. The
mpg123 plugin is now a part of bad plugins set and this leads to
