Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale PATCH v2 1/2] fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass: Stop using ARM-specific architectures

2016-10-08 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Max Krummenacher wrote: > 2016-09-21 13:16 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador : >> The code to dynamically assign the architecture does take into account >> the default tune so we don't need to include the other architectures >> with the SoC suffix into the possible package

Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale PATCH v2 1/2] fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass: Stop using ARM-specific architectures

2016-10-08 Thread Max Krummenacher
Hi 2016-09-21 13:16 GMT+02:00 Otavio Salvador : > The code to dynamically assign the architecture does take into account > the default tune so we don't need to include the other architectures > with the SoC suffix into the possible package architecture list. > > This allow for the class to be used

[meta-freescale] [meta-freescale PATCH v2 1/2] fsl-dynamic-packagearch.bbclass: Stop using ARM-specific architectures

2016-09-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
The code to dynamically assign the architecture does take into account the default tune so we don't need to include the other architectures with the SoC suffix into the possible package architecture list. This allow for the class to be used across different architectures (such as PowerPC) thus fix