Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][PATCH v2] dpdk.inc: fix missing numa.h by disabling NUMA options by default

2018-04-03 Thread Belal, Awais
>> Use PACKAGECONFIG to optionally enable the numa option. Looks good to go now. BR, Awais From: California Sullivan Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:18 AM To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Cc: Belal, Awais; California

Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][PATCH] dpdk.inc: fix missing numa.h by disabling NUMA options by default

2018-04-03 Thread Cal Sullivan
Thanks for the feedback. v2 has been sent. Assuming no other issues are found I'll merge tomorrow. Apologies for the delays. Thanks, Cal On 04/01/2018 10:37 PM, Belal, Awais wrote: +PACKAGECONFIG[libnuma] = ",,libnuma" This dependency should be on 'numactl' which is provided under meta-oe

[meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][PATCH v2] dpdk.inc: fix missing numa.h by disabling NUMA options by default

2018-04-03 Thread California Sullivan
Otherwise we get this: | dpdk-18.02/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c:27:10: fatal error: numa.h: No such file or directory | #include | ^~~~ | compilation terminated. Use PACKAGECONFIG to optionally enable the numa option. Signed-off-by: California Sullivan

Re: [meta-intel] swupdate yocto

2018-04-03 Thread Stephano Cetola
On 4/2/18 11:49 PM, Mohammad, Jamal M wrote: > I modified EFI_PROVIDER to "grub-efi" for intel-core-i7 machine and generated > a root filesystem ( ext4 ) > > Now I need to create an additional partition to keep this initrd image and > then modify the grub configuration to jump into this. > >

Re: [meta-intel] bootloader used for core-image-full-cmdline

2018-04-03 Thread Stephano Cetola
On 4/3/18 2:54 AM, Mohammad, Jamal M wrote: > Can we use u-boot with Intel boards? This depends on which specific device you are referencing and whether that device manufacturer supports u-boot. I have never seen any x86 based device use u-boot in a production environment. --S > >

Re: [meta-intel] bootloader used for core-image-full-cmdline

2018-04-03 Thread Mohammad, Jamal M
Can we use u-boot with Intel boards? -Original Message- From: Anuj Mittal [mailto:anuj.mit...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 3:23 PM To: Mohammad, Jamal M ; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] bootloader used for

Re: [meta-intel] bootloader used for core-image-full-cmdline

2018-04-03 Thread Anuj Mittal
On 04/03/2018 11:11 AM, Mohammad, Jamal M wrote: > Hi, > >   > > What is the bootloader used when we flash core-image-minimal or > core-image-full-cmdline image. > It depends on the value of EFI_PROVIDER. It can be grub-efi or systemd-boot. >   > > I don’t see any grub image there in

Re: [meta-intel] swupdate yocto

2018-04-03 Thread Mohammad, Jamal M
I modified EFI_PROVIDER to "grub-efi" for intel-core-i7 machine and generated a root filesystem ( ext4 ) Now I need to create an additional partition to keep this initrd image and then modify the grub configuration to jump into this. Do you have any idea on this where I have to modify the