Thanks, I have merged these and created warrior as well.
Thanks,
Anuj
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 18:27 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> Adjust the LICENSE according to the license files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
> ---
> v3: A new patch.
>
> recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb | 2 +-
> 1 file
Hi Richard
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 13:57 +0800, Richard Liu wrote:
> Q1: why I must set the MACHINE to“intel-corei7-64”? my cpu is atom
> E3845 Soc， not i7, if i set it to intel-core i7, dose the kernel can
> do best performance? I just want to build a kernel for atom（not for
> i7）. In my
Adjust the LICENSE according to the license files.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
v3: A new patch.
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb
b/recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb
index
These two patches can't be applied to the new version DPDK, so move
them to the version specific bb.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
v3: No change.
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc| 2 --
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_17.11.3.bb | 6 +-
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.05.bb | 2 ++
3 files
This is the latest LTS version.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
v3: Drop the two unneeded patches and adjust the LICENSE.
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk_18.11.1.bb
diff --git
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:48:52AM +, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-05-26 at 14:54 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > > If not, we should probably just remove it in do_install_append and
> > not
> > > carry this patch.
> >
> > Do you mean something like this in the dpdk_18.11.1.bb:
> >
Hi,
I haven't tried to deploy or to compile it yet.
I first wandered if building the minimal core image (without any
customization) will give result of image < 1GB.
Anyway, I guess it is something that I will know only after making the
build. I hope it will be < 1GB...
Thanks,
ranran
On Mon,
