Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

> On Jul 13, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On 07/12/2016 12:59 PM, Jianxun Zhang wrote: >> This patch seriese introduces new RMC project and RMC distro that's >> developped based on RMC. >> >> The test is done on several boards, including boards checked

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

> On Jul 13, 2016, at 7:38 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On 07/12/2016 06:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 10:59 -0700, Jianxun Zhang wrote: >>> This patch seriese introduces new RMC project and RMC distro that's >>> developped based on RMC. >>> >>>

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

On 07/12/2016 06:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 10:59 -0700, Jianxun Zhang wrote: >> This patch seriese introduces new RMC project and RMC distro that's >> developped based on RMC. >> >> The test is done on several boards, including boards checked in >> examples. (poky:6bb3069;

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

On 07/12/2016 12:59 PM, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > This patch seriese introduces new RMC project and RMC distro that's > developped based on RMC. > > The test is done on several boards, including boards checked in > examples. (poky:6bb3069; meta-intel: 9bb4622) > > Some people may have checked

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On 07/12/2016 02:36 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> Hi Jianxun, >> >> I'm just starting to look at this - it's a lot and will take awhile, but >> first thing right off is that I'm having a problem building: >> > >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 14:36 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> Hi Jianxun, >> >> I'm just starting to look at this - it's a lot and will take awhile, >> but >> first thing right off is that I'm having a problem building: >> >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

On 07/12/2016 02:36 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi Jianxun, > > I'm just starting to look at this - it's a lot and will take awhile, but > first thing right off is that I'm having a problem building: > Also got this at the end: WARNING: core-image-minimal-1.0-r0 do_image_complete: The license

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 10:59 -0700, Jianxun Zhang wrote: > This patch seriese introduces new RMC project and RMC distro that's > developped based on RMC. > > The test is done on several boards, including boards checked in > examples. (poky:6bb3069; meta-intel: 9bb4622) > > Some people may have

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 14:36 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi Jianxun, > > I'm just starting to look at this - it's a lot and will take awhile, > but > first thing right off is that I'm having a problem building: > We need to get Halstead to make the rmc repo public, I will get that going. Sau! >

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

Hi Jianxun, I'm just starting to look at this - it's a lot and will take awhile, but first thing right off is that I'm having a problem building: $ bitbake core-image-minimal Loading cache: 100% |###| Time: 0:00:00 Loaded

[meta-intel] [PATCH 0/6] Runtime Machine Configuration and Distro

This patch seriese introduces new RMC project and RMC distro that's developped based on RMC. The test is done on several boards, including boards checked in examples. (poky:6bb3069; meta-intel: 9bb4622) Some people may have checked implementation before, but I have done a lot refactoring since