Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/2] intel-corei7-64: add machine configurations specific to leafhill bsp

2016-09-06 Thread Jianxun Zhang
I just provide my comment in lines on console stuff from RMC perspective. Thanks > On Sep 6, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Cal Sullivan > wrote: > > > > On 09/06/2016 10:43 AM, Saul Wold wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 14:18 +0800, Rebecca Chang Swee Fun wrote: >>> We

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/2] intel-corei7-64: add machine configurations specific to leafhill bsp

2016-09-06 Thread Cal Sullivan
On 09/06/2016 10:43 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 14:18 +0800, Rebecca Chang Swee Fun wrote: We would like to enable new BSP for Intel Atom E3900 SoC based platforms. This will help us to consolidate BSP into intel-common and we can use KERNEL_FEATURES to select target BSP to

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH 1/2] intel-corei7-64: add machine configurations specific to leafhill bsp

2016-09-06 Thread Saul Wold
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 14:18 +0800, Rebecca Chang Swee Fun wrote: > We would like to enable new BSP for Intel Atom E3900 SoC based > platforms. > This will help us to consolidate BSP into intel-common and we can use > KERNEL_FEATURES to select target BSP to compile. > > Leaf Hill uses different

[meta-intel] [PATCH 1/2] intel-corei7-64: add machine configurations specific to leafhill bsp

2016-09-05 Thread Rebecca Chang Swee Fun
We would like to enable new BSP for Intel Atom E3900 SoC based platforms. This will help us to consolidate BSP into intel-common and we can use KERNEL_FEATURES to select target BSP to compile. Leaf Hill uses different serial console port setup. Hence this mechanism are in place to enable new bsp