> I'm suggesting that nobody will be taking e.g core-image-sato and be able to
> work out of the box with dpdk installed, as they'll need a toolchain to build
> their own application against dpdk. Let's just not install it in the images,
> and a
> user will either write a recipe for their image or
On 18 September 2014 03:21, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
>> On their own, the DPDK packages are useless as the user needs to compile
>> their application with them. What you're basically doing is forcing a
>> library onto
>> *every* image for that machine, even ones that don't want to use DPDK.
>> Ple
> On their own, the DPDK packages are useless as the user needs to compile
> their application with them. What you're basically doing is forcing a
> library onto
> *every* image for that machine, even ones that don't want to use DPDK.
> Please don't do that.
So, reading from your feedback, I thi
] [PATCH V2 3/3] meta-romley: DPDK v1.7.0 support for
Romley machine config
Hi Sreeju,
Aren¹t there other BSPs such as crystalforest which can utilize the DPDK
feature?
Nitin
On 9/17/14, 7:20 AM, "sreeju.armughanx.selva...@intel.com"
wrote:
>From: Sreeju Selva
On 17 September 2014 15:20, wrote:
> Added MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS to include dpdk v1.7.0 support
> for romley machiine, so that dpdk will be enabled by default
> for Romley. Also included the dpdk example package, so that
> user can use example apps to exercise the DPDK libraries.
I went thro
Hi Sreeju,
Aren¹t there other BSPs such as crystalforest which can utilize the DPDK
feature?
Nitin
On 9/17/14, 7:20 AM, "sreeju.armughanx.selva...@intel.com"
wrote:
>From: Sreeju Selvaraj
>
>Added MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS to include dpdk v1.7.0 support
>for romley machiine, so that dpdk wil
From: Sreeju Selvaraj
Added MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS to include dpdk v1.7.0 support
for romley machiine, so that dpdk will be enabled by default
for Romley. Also included the dpdk example package, so that
user can use example apps to exercise the DPDK libraries.
Signed-off-by: Sreeju Selvaraj
