Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-02 Thread Hart, Darren
On 9/2/14, 10:51, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote: >> > >> >> How is this the case? In 3/5, the new recipe includes the line: >> >> +LICENSE = "Intel-Microcode-License" >> >> >> So, how is it the license does not need to be whitelisted? > > >What is listed in the LICENSE_FLAGS variable need to be whi

Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-02 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
> > > > How is this the case? In 3/5, the new recipe includes the line: > > +LICENSE = "Intel-Microcode-License" > > > So, how is it the license does not need to be whitelisted? What is listed in the LICENSE_FLAGS variable need to be whitelisted. The LICENSE is a required variable for every

Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-02 Thread Hart, Darren
On 9/2/14, 10:18, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote: >> >> Hrm... I confess I forget where we left this. Do we not need the enabled >> condition? What happens if you try to build images for meta-intel >>systems >> without the meta-intel license whitelisted? My understanding is that >>those >> recipes stil

Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-02 Thread Hart, Darren
On 9/2/14, 8:29, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] >> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 8:39 AM >> To: Kamble, Nitin A >> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Hart, Darren; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [Patch v5 5/5] use the

Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-02 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
> > Hrm... I confess I forget where we left this. Do we not need the enabled > condition? What happens if you try to build images for meta-intel systems > without the meta-intel license whitelisted? My understanding is that those > recipes still need to parse, but that will fail if the license req

Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-02 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
> -Original Message- > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 8:39 AM > To: Kamble, Nitin A > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Hart, Darren; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode > loading

Re: [meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-09-01 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 August 2014 18:22, wrote: > # if enabled, include user space intel microcode loading support in the > generated images. > MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS = "intel-microcode iucode-tool" > + > +# if enabled, use the microcode added initrd I don't see any conditional tests for the "if enabled"

[meta-intel] [Patch v5 5/5] use the INITRD list mechanism for early microcode loading

2014-08-29 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble Now the oecore layer has support for multiple filesystem concatenated initrd images, use it to implement the early microcode loading support for BSPs. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble --- conf/machine/include/meta-intel.inc | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git