.
BR,
Awais
From: Cal Sullivan <california.l.sulli...@intel.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 2:26 AM
To: Belal, Awais; Kevin Hao
Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][PATCH 2/2] dpdk: merge recipe and include
Hi Awais, Kevin,
In testing I ran int
Hi Awais, Kevin,
In testing I ran into some compilation problems:
https://pastebin.com/n8dhUmZT
I was able to fix it by disabling some options, but I don't know the
ramifications of these changes.
In working on this I noticed most of the sed commands in that
do_configure block could use a
Re: [meta-intel] [meta-dpdk][PATCH 2/2] dpdk: merge recipe and include
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> Is patch 1/2 good to merge?
Yes.
>
> It looks like in order for 18.02 and 17.11 to use the same .inc file we will
> need to move the LIC_FILES_CHK
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:34:42AM -0700, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> Is patch 1/2 good to merge?
Yes.
>
> It looks like in order for 18.02 and 17.11 to use the same .inc file we will
> need to move the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM out of it, but that can be done later. 17.11
> seems to have upstreamed the same
Is patch 1/2 good to merge?
It looks like in order for 18.02 and 17.11 to use the same .inc file we
will need to move the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM out of it, but that can be done
later. 17.11 seems to have upstreamed the same patch that was dropped in
this upgrade, so we're good on that front as
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:27:48PM +0500, Awais Belal wrote:
> Since we only have a single version supported at the
> moment, which is the latest and the greatest. It is
> best that the include and base recipe files are merged
> to allow better maintainability and readability.
Please don't do
Since we only have a single version supported at the
moment, which is the latest and the greatest. It is
best that the include and base recipe files are merged
to allow better maintainability and readability.
Signed-off-by: Awais Belal
---
recipes-extended/dpdk/dpdk.inc