, September 20, 2013 2:11 PM
To: Zanussi, Tom
Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Ong, Boon Leong; Haw, Foo Chien
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove
redundant files, clean up broken ones
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 09:35 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu
-Original Message-
From: Zanussi, Tom
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:20 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Darren Hart; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Ong, Boon Leong; Haw, Foo
Chien
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove redundant
files, clean up broken ones
, 2013 2:11 PM
To: Zanussi, Tom
Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Ong, Boon Leong; Haw, Foo Chien
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove redundant
files, clean up broken ones
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 09:35 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 00:43
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 09:35 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 00:43 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 September 2013 00:31, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 23:23 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Most BSPs appear to be derived from what appears to be a
@yoctoproject.org; Ong, Boon Leong; Haw, Foo Chien
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove redundant
files, clean up broken ones
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 09:35 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 00:43 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 September 2013 00:31, Darren
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 14:33 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
I'm building sugarbay, n450, and jasperforest with ross's branch. Will
report back.
All successfully completed a core-image-sato build.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 3:42 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Ong, Boon Leong; Haw, Foo
Chien
Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove redundant
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 23:23 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Most BSPs appear to be derived from what appears to be a stale copy of the
atom-pc xorg.conf which was either repeating defaults (the screen
configuration), pointlessly hard-coding (specifying video driver when X can
auto-probe), or
On 19 September 2013 00:31, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 23:23 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
Most BSPs appear to be derived from what appears to be a stale copy of the
atom-pc xorg.conf which was either repeating defaults (the screen
configuration), pointlessly
On 19 September 2013 00:43, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
Typically we do changes like with one patch per BSP to help keep things
a bit more flexible in the face of regressions.
I started doing that but then got rapidly bored with copy-paste... I
can split it up though.
The same
10 matches
Mail list logo
