Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] mkl-dnn: Initial recipe for Intel Math Kernel Library

2019-02-11 Thread Ankit Navik
Hi Ross, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:52 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > Sure, I meant the library and the tests/examples should be in different > *packages* (not recipes). > Ohh, Roger that! Will incorporate in v2. > > Also, are the tests reliable and can be ran without interaction? If so > then

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] mkl-dnn: Initial recipe for Intel Math Kernel Library

2019-02-11 Thread Burton, Ross
Sure, I meant the library and the tests/examples should be in different *packages* (not recipes). Also, are the tests reliable and can be ran without interaction? If so then adding ptest support would be great. Ross On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 10:14, Ankit Navik wrote: > Hi Ross, > > On Mon, Feb

Re: [meta-intel] [PATCH] mkl-dnn: Initial recipe for Intel Math Kernel Library

2019-02-11 Thread Ankit Navik
Hi Ross, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:38 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 03:59, Ankit Navik wrote: > >> +EXTRA_OECMAKE += "-DWITH_EXAMPLE=ON" >> +EXTRA_OECMAKE += "-DWITH_TEST=ON" >> > > Should the examples/tests be packaged independently to the library? > The intention here is