On 4/29/22 3:00 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
Andrew,
In the subject - omap-a15 is not a machine, but an SoC family, at least from
OE perspective.
Will fix the wording.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:34:10AM -0500, Andrew Davis via
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
The "omap-a15" is a bit of a
Andrew,
In the subject - omap-a15 is not a machine, but an SoC family, at least from
OE perspective.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:34:10AM -0500, Andrew Davis via
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> The "omap-a15" is a bit of a legacy holdover and is confusing.
> This causes issues with mixed usage
The "omap-a15" is a bit of a legacy holdover and is confusing.
This causes issues with mixed usage of 'dra7xx' and 'omap-a15'.
For example all EVM using this SoC family include dra7x.inc
so both are always defined, then we use 'omap-a15' in several
places where we really mean 'am57xx'. 'dra7xx'
