Re: [meta-virtualization] Can we have a standard approach for Go?

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Christian Holl wrote: > Hi, > > I saw that there is a implementation of Go inside > meta-virtualization. > > > I am currently trying to build influxdb, telegraf and grafana for my > rasberrypi. > > And telegraf depends on docker. Which is also

Re: [meta-virtualization] Can we have a standard approach for Go?

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Christian Holl > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I saw that there is a implementation of Go inside >> meta-virtualization. >> >> >> I am currently trying to build

[meta-virtualization] Can we have a standard approach for Go?

Hi, I saw that there is a implementation of Go inside meta-virtualization. I am currently trying to build influxdb, telegraf and grafana for my rasberrypi. And telegraf depends on docker. Which is also written in Go. But I am using oe-meta-go for other recipes and they don't work together.

Re: [meta-virtualization] LXD anyone?

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Massimiliano Malisan < max.malisan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > is anyone currently working on creating a recipe for LXD? > We started creating one about a year ago (and it was discussed, but I can't find a reference now) .. but that effort never did make

[meta-virtualization] LXD anyone?

Hi all, is anyone currently working on creating a recipe for LXD? I have been working on one in the last days but I still have some issues to have it run properly; being quite new to Yocto I am not sure if they depend on something in my recipe or some other missing dependency or configuration,