Hi, On 04/06/19 23:09, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote: > That is great news! > >> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:07, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <manju...@xilinx.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> We plan to release warrior by end of month. >> We also want to see if we can backport patches of u-boot from Luca to enable >> cleaner SPL flow for PMU config objects. >> If we cannot do it by 6/30, we want to make sure we can add it after the >> release branch is cut. >> Please see: >> https://lucaceresoli.net/zynqmp-uboot-spl-pmufw-cfg-load/ >> or >> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/booting-u-boot-spl-zynqmp-step-forward-luca-ceresoli/ > > Thanks again Luca. Hey, here's my question from the post comment, and a bonus > one:
And then I'll pretty much replicate the answers I gave there. :) > * Does this mean we should switch to mainline u-boot or does xilinx/u-boot > closely tracks that mainline? It's your choice. I think the differences are not many (way less than for the kernel at least). What are the big pieces from xilinx/u-boot not yet upstreamed? AFAIK only Dual QSPI. But git diff is your friend. > * What do you guys do to get the pm_cfg_obj.c generated? Manually? Manually here. It's enough for my needs. BTW I'm not using meta-xilinx-tools. -- Luca -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
