Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-21 Thread Jason Wu
On 22/03/2016 2:45 AM, avallash wrote: Hi, First of all, thank you Nathan for the information and the links - they were quite helpful. I finally had time to work with SPL. I'm using the 2016.03 rc tag as Nathan suggested. I started with some basic configurations that correspond to the config

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-21 Thread avallash
Hi, First of all, thank you Nathan for the information and the links - they were quite helpful. I finally had time to work with SPL. I'm using the 2016.03 rc tag as Nathan suggested. I started with some basic configurations that correspond to the config from my ps7_init_gpl.(c|h) (for now I just

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-19 Thread Jason Wu
On 16/03/2016 6:21 AM, Richard Cagley wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Nathan Rossi wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:48 PM, avallash wrote: Hi, That's great news. Could you point me in the right direction? Is there a thread discussing this topic in detail? I don't think there is a th

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-19 Thread Jason Wu
On 17/03/2016 1:38 AM, Richard Cagley wrote: Hi, I am not building against the exact commit id ( but a merge branch of 2016.03) and targeting Zybo instead of picozed. I have no issue building the images and booting it. You can see my recipe here: https://github.com/socnix-lab/meta-xilinx/tree/j

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-18 Thread Richard Cagley
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Jason Wu wrote: > > > On 16/03/2016 6:21 AM, Richard Cagley wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Nathan Rossi >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:48 PM, avallash wrote: Hi, That's great news. Could you point me in the right direction

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-15 Thread Richard Cagley
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Nathan Rossi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:48 PM, avallash wrote: >> Hi, >> That's great news. Could you point me in the right direction? >> Is there a thread discussing this topic in detail? > > I don't think there is a thread discussing the recipe setup proce

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-05 Thread Nathan Rossi
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:48 PM, avallash wrote: > Hi, > That's great news. Could you point me in the right direction? > Is there a thread discussing this topic in detail? I don't think there is a thread discussing the recipe setup process although there are a few regarding using u-boot 2016.01 fo

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-04 Thread avallash
Hi, That's great news. Could you point me in the right direction? Is there a thread discussing this topic in detail? If there isn't, can you recall what needed fixing? Best regards, Avallash --- Pozdrawiam, Bogusz Brodziński On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Ph

Re: [meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-03 Thread Philip Balister
On 03/03/2016 01:58 PM, avallash wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with zynq7000 based system (in many areas similar to zc706) and > currently I rely on FSBL generated by petalinux and I'm thinking of > dropping it and using u-boot's SPL as one of steps on gong full > bitbake/yocto. I have spent some t

[meta-xilinx] Can SPL be used instead of FSBL?

2016-03-03 Thread avallash
Hi, I'm working with zynq7000 based system (in many areas similar to zc706) and currently I rely on FSBL generated by petalinux and I'm thinking of dropping it and using u-boot's SPL as one of steps on gong full bitbake/yocto. I have spent some time trying to configure and use SPL, but with no pro