Re: [meta-xilinx] Support for PicoZed 7030 and FMC V2 Carrier

2018-07-31 Thread Andreas Galauner
On 31.07.2018 23:30, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote: > Can you submit the patch to u-boot mainline? I just sent out the patch email. - Andy -- ___ meta-xilinx mailing list meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org

Re: [meta-xilinx] Support for PicoZed 7030 and FMC V2 Carrier

2018-07-31 Thread Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
[meta-xilinx] Support for PicoZed 7030 and FMC V2 Carrier > > On 10.07.2018 17:05, Thomas Goodwin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm attempting to build the picozed-zynq7 machine using meta-xilinx > > with Poky 2.4.2.  I've tried using the /rocko/ branch as well as > > /

Re: [meta-xilinx] Support for PicoZed 7030 and FMC V2 Carrier

2018-07-31 Thread Thomas Goodwin
Thanks for confirming. I ended up doing something similar to the kernel too. Hopefully Xilinx does upstream the patch! On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:38 PM Andreas Galauner wrote: > On 10.07.2018 17:05, Thomas Goodwin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm attempting to build the picozed-zynq7 machine using

Re: [meta-xilinx] Support for PicoZed 7030 and FMC V2 Carrier

2018-07-31 Thread Andreas Galauner
On 10.07.2018 17:05, Thomas Goodwin wrote: > Hello, > > I'm attempting to build the picozed-zynq7 machine using meta-xilinx with > Poky 2.4.2.  I've tried using the /rocko/ branch as well as > /rel-v2018.2/.  For the latter, I had to patch the machine definition > since it was missing /require >

[meta-xilinx] Support for PicoZed 7030 and FMC V2 Carrier

2018-07-10 Thread Thomas Goodwin
Hello, I'm attempting to build the picozed-zynq7 machine using meta-xilinx with Poky 2.4.2. I've tried using the *rocko* branch as well as *rel-v2018.2*. For the latter, I had to patch the machine definition since it was missing *require *(PR: https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx/pull/9). My