ive.
Hope this helps!
Lori C. Fraind
Delex Systems, Inc.
(703) 734-8300 x310
-Original Message-
From: David Bovill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Metacard based browser?
What's a SCORM when you find one?
>
What's a SCORM when you find one?
>I found out today that in April 2001, the Department of Defense will be
>issuing a directive that all future training development must be WBT and
>SCORM compliant. I hope MetaCard will qualify as a Web-Based Training
>mechanism. (It's my understanding that the S
Practically speaking I'd like to start by enabling Metacard to download, browse and
search the online list archives.
The first problem is I can't get the html page, as there is a re-diret on it and:
get url "http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/"
url "http://www.mail
>>
>>Please, can anyone save me from the RFC???
>
>There is no escape from RFCs :-0
>>
Aha, but there is. For now I can use an xThing. I've looked at the "Really Friendly C"
stuff, and I have'nt got a word to say against them - just a bit long maybe. By the
way where are they again?
Archives:
>A French car?
>
>>Scott Rossi wrote:
>>
>>> My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
>>> existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
>>
>>One word: tables.
>>
>>Okay, two words: nested tables.
>>
>
>The thought makes me shiver -:)
>
>OK, here is
>I was thinking of using CSSP for layouts for users with later browsers, and designing
>style sheets that then work and look good for both the MetaCard environment and the
>average web user. Template based web authoring, with added ease of dynamic CGI
>scripting is what I think is worth aimi
A French car?
>Scott Rossi wrote:
>
>> My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
>> existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
>
>One word: tables.
>
>Okay, two words: nested tables.
>
The thought makes me shiver -:)
OK, here is the first proble
OK, already
>My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
>existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches. One big
>problem I see for you is that with there are multiple ways to describe
>the same layout information. Will you be able to test for the
