Scott:
set the hideConsoleWindows to true
put "http://www.metacard.com" into tURL
get shell("start" tURL)
Not sure if I love you or hate you!
/H
Hmm, doesn't work on my computer (running XP) unless I set the shellCommand
to cmd.exe. (I saw the note in the documentation about this.) So now
I'm curious: Does it work on your XP system *without* this
modification? If it is required for XP (and NT?), is it also backward
compatible to
Hmm, doesn't work on my computer (running XP) unless I set the shellCommand
to cmd.exe. (I saw the note in the documentation about this.) So now
I'm curious: Does it work on your XP system *without* this
modification? If it is required for XP (and NT?), is it also backward
compatible to
Does anyone have a script to removing HTML from a string/chunk/whole file?
I think the following is safer, coz I've often seen javascript code
after the body :
function html2text htmlRaw
# trim all html tag
put offset(body,htmlRaw) into bodyStart
if bodyStart 0 then
delete char 1
Wilhelm wrote:
Thanks for the responses. I am sorry, but these relative paths do not
work here.
They worked - for years - with earlier versions, but not with the latest
Metacard version on Windows 98. I tried on two different computers. No
problems with image and sound files, but with
Thanks for the responses. I am sorry, but these relative paths do not
work here.
They worked - for years - with earlier versions, but not with the latest
Metacard version on Windows 98. I tried on two different computers. No
problems with image and sound files, but with mov-files.
I
Any word on the Pocket PC/Windows CE version of MetaCard?
Even if there is a long list of 'dos and donts', I don't care...as long as we
can make a few buttons in a window, and add some network communications I
would be happy.
JR
___
metacard mailing
Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, doesn't work on my computer (running XP) unless I set the shellCommand to "cmd.exe." (I saw the note in the documentation about this.) So now I'm curious: Does it work on your XP system *without* this modification? If it is required for XP (and NT?),
