Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-13 Thread Richard Gaskin
Ken Ray wrote: On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:20:03 -0800, Richard Gaskin wrote: But for the Rev IDE to do things which contradict engine behavior only complicates things for their IDE and all others. Sure would be nice if they want something in the engine that they'd just do it. Just got confirmat

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-13 Thread Ken Ray
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:20:03 -0800, Richard Gaskin wrote: > But for the Rev IDE to do things which contradict engine behavior > only complicates things for their IDE and all others. Sure would be > nice if they want something in the engine that they'd just do it. Just got confirmation from Oli

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-12 Thread Richard Gaskin
Ken Ray wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:50:59 +0100, Klaus Major wrote: I found that I also put this line into my home stack after I read about this bug in version 2.7 :-) That may be why a lot of the people I've contacted have told me that their "default" is TRUE... That third-party IDEs wo

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-11 Thread Ken Ray
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:50:59 +0100, Klaus Major wrote: > I found that I also put this line into my home stack after I read > about this bug in version 2.7 :-) That may be why a lot of the people I've contacted have told me that their "default" is TRUE... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc.

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-11 Thread Klaus Major
Hi friends, On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:10:01 -0600, J. Landman Gay wrote: Sorry, I didn't even think of that. I removed a custom backscript and restarted MC. Now the allowinterrupts is false, so it looks like an engine default. I thought Mark fixed that a couple of versions ago. I remember that Re

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-09 Thread Ken Ray
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:10:01 -0600, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Sorry, I didn't even think of that. I removed a custom backscript and > restarted MC. Now the allowinterrupts is false, so it looks like an > engine default. I thought Mark fixed that a couple of versions ago. I > remember that Rev shi

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-09 Thread J. Landman Gay
Ken Ray wrote: > On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:12:58 -0600, J. Landman Gay wrote: > >> Ken Ray wrote: >> >>> So the big question... are any of you experiencing this same problem >>> in the MC IDE? The basic test I did was (a) launch MC, open the >>> message box, type "put the allowInterrupts"... >> Rev e

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-09 Thread Ken Ray
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:12:58 -0600, J. Landman Gay wrote: > Ken Ray wrote: > >> So the big question... are any of you experiencing this same problem >> in the MC IDE? The basic test I did was (a) launch MC, open the >> message box, type "put the allowInterrupts"... > > Rev engine 2.8.1, MC 2.8

Re: AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-09 Thread J. Landman Gay
Ken Ray wrote: So the big question... are any of you experiencing this same problem in the MC IDE? The basic test I did was (a) launch MC, open the message box, type "put the allowInterrupts"... Rev engine 2.8.1, MC 2.8.3: allowinterrupts is true Haven't had time yet to install MC 2.8.4. --

AllowInterrupts 'False' By Default?

2007-11-09 Thread Ken Ray
I've been dealing with the fact that I have been unable to Command-period out of script execution for many months, and even complained about that to Richard... however he didn't seem to have any problems. So after doing a lot of testing, I have come to the following facts: 1) A brand new build