I guess so, although I'd probably want a lawyer to take a good look just in
case one of you guys implements something that would add value to Rev.
However, if it's GPL it's just another good reason for you to go with a
plugin architecture.
I know it sounds like a newbie question but anyway,
jbv wrote:
could someone be kind enough to explain to me briefly how does
this plugin arch. work in Rev ?
Basically it's just a menu built dynamically to provide quick access to
stack files in a Plugins folder. Rev builds its menu at startup, but my
own plugins menu works so fast being built
Richard,
jbv wrote:
could someone be kind enough to explain to me briefly how does
this plugin arch. work in Rev ?
Basically it's just a menu built dynamically to provide quick access to
stack files in a Plugins folder. Rev builds its menu at startup, but my
own plugins menu works so
jbv wrote:
One last question : could we also drop standalones into that Plugins
folder ? I don't see any specific reason to do that right now, I'm just
wondering if that would be feasable...
H... an interesting idea. If we come up with a reason to do it, it
shouldm't be hard to do.
--
I'm very strongly opposed to hierarchical menus except where
absolutely necessary, as they're simply more physically
diffcult to use (lose the use of your dominant arm for a few
months and accessibility issues become very clear g). I'm
envisioning this Plug-Ins menu being a simple
]
cc:^
Subject:MC IDE's home
Update
--
I asked Scott if we could have an FTP account set up for the IDE project at
metacard.com. While that won't work, he suggested setting the project up at
SourceForge.net. In accordance with his wishes, I'll set up the project's
home there as soon
Next Steps
--
I've acting as a sort of interim coordinator simply because some ongoing
discussions of bugs and related issues with Scott made it convenient to ask
him for these details to get the thing rolling. We should probably decide
how and by whom changes will be made going forward.
On 9/8/03 4:24 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
Richard, since you have started the ball rolling and have been already
involved dealing with Scott and Rev folks on this issue, I'd vote for
you to continue for now unless you really do not want to do it.
I agree 100%. I vote for Richard. I'm in
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003, Richard Gaskin wrote:
(snip)
I've acting as a sort of interim coordinator simply because some ongoing
discussions of bugs and related issues with Scott made it convenient to ask
him for these details to get the thing rolling. We should probably decide
how and by whom
On 9/8/03 4:24 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:
Richard, since you have started the ball rolling and have been already
involved dealing with Scott and Rev folks on this issue, I'd vote for
you to continue for now unless you really do not want to do it.
Richard, you have my vote. Is your title
Richard Gaskin wrote:
I asked Scott if we could have an FTP account set up for the IDE project at
metacard.com. While that won't work, he suggested setting the project up at
SourceForge.net. In accordance with his wishes, I'll set up the project's
home there as soon as we get a copy of
Ray G. Miller wrote:
Richard, you have my vote. Is your title Chief Poohbah or simply
Hw-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed ?
I prefer Poohbah.
At the moment it seems no one else has an interest in herding cats 'cept
Xavier and myself, so how about Xavier as my running mate in a single-party
election?
David Bovill wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
I asked Scott if we could have an FTP account set up for the IDE project at
metacard.com. While that won't work, he suggested setting the project up at
SourceForge.net. In accordance with his wishes, I'll set up the project's
home there as soon
Scott will have to use the LGPL licence I think, which is what the
current project is set up for. I can help with advice, on how to use the
Sourceforge account for anyone interested in contributing.
Could it be changed to GPL? Or is there an advantage to LGPL over GPL for
this project?
Monte Goulding wrote:
Scott will have to use the LGPL licence I think, which is what the
current project is set up for. I can help with advice, on how to use the
Sourceforge account for anyone interested in contributing.
Could it be changed to GPL? Or is there an advantage to LGPL over
Scott will have to use the LGPL licence I think, which is what the
current project is set up for. I can help with advice, on how
to use the
Sourceforge account for anyone interested in contributing.
Could it be changed to GPL? Or is there an advantage to LGPL
over GPL for
this
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Cool. What's the URL? I thought you couldn't set up a project there until
you had a file ready to go (
Better still send me your user name and I'll register you as chief
poobah! Think you should get an email with all the instructions sent to
you and can play to your
17 matches
Mail list logo
