revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Klaus Major
Hi friends, after reading and answering a mail form Malte (how to distinguish between MC and REV) I checked revappversion() after a very long time (since version 2.9 I think) and was VERY surprised that: answer revappversion() gives me: 2.5.1 2.5.1 ? WTF??? I checked the script of one of

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Klaus, What does the version return in MC? AFAIK it should return the engine version. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum Please visit

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Mark Schonewille
Klaus, This changed at some point. When MC became Rev, the version was changed to return a version number that is equal for both the engine and the IDE, making revappversion obsolete. Hence the 0 in the MC function. Perhaps you need to supplement the version with a new MC function, e.g.

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Mark, Klaus, This changed at some point. When did it change, that is the question! This has been working fine until at least engine 2.9! When MC became Rev, the version was changed to return a version number that is equal for both the engine and the IDE, making revappversion

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Klaus Major
Hi all, just checked the Rev doc about revappversion(): ... The revAppVersion function is different from the version function! ... revappversion() = IDE the version = engine So there is something else going on... Best Klaus -- Klaus Major kl...@major-k.de http://www.major-k.de

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Klaus, It looks like the docs need to be updated. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum Please visit http://tinyurl.com/d6ojex and click on Stem --Thank

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread J. Landman Gay
Mark Schonewille wrote: Hi Klaus, It looks like the docs need to be updated. It still responds correctly for me in Rev. I get 3.0.0 in Rev, and 0 in MC. I hope it doesn't change, because I use it a lot of stacks. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread J. Landman Gay
Klaus Major wrote: Hi friends, after reading and answering a mail form Malte (how to distinguish between MC and REV) I checked revappversion() after a very long time (since version 2.9 I think) and was VERY surprised that: answer revappversion() gives me: 2.5.1 2.5.1 ? WTF??? I'm using

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Jacque, It changed already and this change shouldn't affect your projects, as revAppVersion() and the version now return the same number. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Dutch forum:

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Jacqueline, Mark Schonewille wrote: Hi Klaus, It looks like the docs need to be updated. It still responds correctly for me in Rev. I get 3.0.0 in Rev, and 0 in MC. I just downloaded a fresh mctools stack from the Yahoo MC group and still get 2.5.1? Am I cursed again? :-) Best

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Tariel Gogoberidze
Klaus, I checked on my copies of MC 2.8.1, 2.9 and 3.9 and revappversion() returns 0 May be you should check the scripts in your Home stack? Tariel ___ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com

Re: revappversion()

2009-02-26 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Tariel, Klaus, I checked on my copies of MC 2.8.1, 2.9 and 3.9 and revappversion() returns 0 May be you should check the scripts in your Home stack? Been there, done that, nada... Tariel Best Klaus -- Klaus Major kl...@major-k.de http://www.major-k.de