I need to open a local url in a browser under windows. I've tried the
solution previously proposed :
on launchBrowser theURL
set the hideConsoleWindows to true
put empty into theTitle
if NT is in the systemVersion then
set the shellCommand to cmd.exe
put quote quote into theTitle
Herve,
I use the same function and it works like a charm...
Is your url correct?
cheers
Xavier
-Original Message-
From: Hervé Chaudet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2003 10:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Opening a local URl (Windows)
I need to open a local url
Le vendredi, 17 jan 2003, à 10:43 Europe/Paris,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Herve,
I use the same function and it works like a charm...
Is your url correct?
The syntax of the url is the same as shown in the url field of explorer
when I open the file directly in it. Ex: C:\xxx\yyy.html
| De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Hervé Chaudet
| Envoyé : Friday, January 17, 2003 11:20 AM
| À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Objet : Re: Opening a local URl (Windows)
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
|
| Herve,
| I use the same function and it works
Le vendredi, 17 jan 2003, à 12:18 Europe/Paris, thierry Douez a écrit :
| De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Hervé Chaudet
| Envoyé : Friday, January 17, 2003 11:20 AM
| À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Objet : Re: Opening a local URl (Windows)
|
| [EMAIL
AHA!
you are browsing files, not the net...
in that case you can use:
get shell(explorer c:\blabla)
or better (without blocking MC until the explorer is closed)
open process cmd /c explorer quote c:\blabla quote
-Original Message-
From: Hervé Chaudet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
hi'all scripters doin'?
Anyone got the list of the possible platform function answers?
It's for a serious case of system intelligence!
TIA
Xavier
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
1. The Metacard 2.4.3 reference stack entry for mainStack says that
stacks created with the create or clone commands become substacks of the
topStack. Is this true? The clone becomes the top stack. I don't see it
listed among the substacks of the (previous) top stack, and when I check its
own