Re: MC-REV Event similar to AppleEvent?

2004-01-21 Thread RCS
What is the benefit of parsing an event rather than handling them directly? I need to be able to update a stack/card script in a standalone, and I cannot because of the limit imposed. The stack script contains (mostly) typical handlers (i.e. openStack, resumeStack, etc.) for handling messages

Re: MC-REV Event similar to AppleEvent?

2004-01-21 Thread Robert Brenstein
What is the benefit of parsing an event rather than handling them directly? I need to be able to update a stack/card script in a standalone, and I cannot because of the limit imposed. The stack script contains (mostly) typical handlers (i.e. openStack, resumeStack, etc.) for handling messages

Re: MC-REV Event similar to AppleEvent?

2004-01-21 Thread Richard Gaskin
RCS wrote: What is the benefit of parsing an event rather than handling them directly? I need to be able to update a stack/card script in a standalone, and I cannot because of the limit imposed. Actually, you can't because of OS restrictions in Win and UNIX which prevent a running EXE from

Re: MC-REV Event similar to AppleEvent?

2004-01-21 Thread Alain Farmer
Hello, I need to be able to update a stack/card script in a standalone, and I cannot because of the limit imposed ... Hummm .. Seems easy enough to me. Integrate one or more do statement[s] in your generic handler. The script that gets 'done' can be located elsewhere, e.g. in a field, in a