I've been getting a lot of questions about What are 'active' plugins?
I'd like to make v2.6 final soon, but I must admit I still have
misgivings about adding the active plugin mode.
Folks understand what it is to open a stack, and what it is to library a
stack. But they don't seem to grok active,
Hi folks,
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
So the question is:
Do we need an active mode for plugins in addition to
the engine-supported open and library options?
Cast my vote for no. My preference is to keep things simple.
Same for me :-)
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media,
On 7/18/04 11:06 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Do we need an active mode for plugins in addition to
the engine-supported open and library options?
I've never needed it. Just removing a library stack when I'm done with
it seems to do the trick.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL
Bonsoir All,
If needed, transcript is, as is, full featured to let us start any new
stack's add-ons at any time, without having to restart the main Rev
running process. I use such features trough http POST commands, each
time i need to update a net accessible app. So, the best is probably to
Hello RCS and y.all,
Converting stacks to html...hasn't everyone figured
out how to do this? It's quite simple actually...
I have been hand-coding HTML output from within stacks
for years. Most of the material on this subject in the
Pan comes from yours-truly. If I did not craft it then
I am
I must admit, I really don't understand the need for a 3rd 'active' mode either. As
one who has already built quite a few plugins, I neve never seen a reason for an
'active mode as you describe. One of the best features of Metacard is it's simplicity.
My vote is to keep it that way.
Best,
On 7/18/04 11:06 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I'd like to make v2.6 final soon
Speaking of which, I just spent a frustrating session trying to debug
why the MC IDE went nuts during the initialization of the plug-in menu
item. Turns out if you put an OS X alias to a file into the plug-ins
folder,
