I would absolutely be willing to pay for a multi-platform browser tool like this one
accessible from RR/MC.
The free access to a browser in MC isn't what I need; launching the user's browser
rather than keeping the user in the context of my application isn't acceptable for
much of my
--On Sunday, June 15, 2003 19:06:46 -0700 Dan Shafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And I would prefer a product I pay for and which is therefore supported
to a free, Open Source solution for which I'd be on my own for support.
This is a little off subject but you don't seem to have it very
--On Monday, June 16, 2003 00:25:57 -0700 Dan Shafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And I would prefer a product I pay for and which is therefore supported
to a free, Open Source solution for which I'd be on my own for support.
snip
First, my observation didn't imply that Open Source software
Scott Rossi wrote:
In any event, specialized browsers seem like an area worth exploring.
I agree. I've been touting specialized browsers for about five years now. Some have
appeared. I think this is going to become an even more significant trend now that MS
has dropped IE development.
The
to become an even more significant trend now that MS has
dropped IE development.
this has been mentioned a few times on this list and i tried
finding information regarding it on microsoft's website but
to no avail.. anyone have any URL's they can email me
offlist
There are literally dozens
Do any of you have a link to current stats of the marketshare for various
default screen resolutions?
http://www.servustats.com/screen_resolutionex.php
Shows 43.7% at 1024x768, 39.5% at 800x600.
My guess? It's not going to change any time soon. I think it's been in that ballpark
for several
Seems to run fine on OS X. I hate the game, always have. It always shows me up. Yours
did, too. But it worked fine. Right up to the point I smashed my LCD display.
:-)
Scott,
Very Cool! Works great on XP.
2nd time thru, used only 5 slotsmust admit to being a bit lucky! ;-)
-Chipp
Actually, it's one of my favorite pastimes. I've just never been as good at it as I'd
like!
Recently, Dan Shafer wrote:
go stack url http://www.tactilemedia.com/test/stacks/kodekraker.mc;
Seems to run fine on OS X. I hate the game, always have. It always shows me
up. Yours did, too
I have a different perspective from most people on this list and probably don't have a
right to a strong opinion on MC vs. RR but I figured I'd chime in anyway.
Irrepressible, you know.
I looked closely at both MC and RR when I decided to join the Revolution when it was
still in 1.1.1 release.
(WARNING: This is a bit of a long rant and is probably of marginal interest unless you
are a programming language junkie or just interested in the history of our business.
You've been warned.)
Chipp Walters wrote:
But, the question is, will RR sellout? Meaning, what if Oracle or Adobe or
Dan Shaefer wrote: ...OracleCard, which is what Oracle turned PLUS into, was a
fantastic, dynamite product. But its price tag was necessarily low, profit margins
modest, and demand for it anemic. Eventually, Oracle cut it loose Is this the
same product that was known as Oracle Media
Shari wrote:
I envy those of you who are 35 and under, who at least had computer access as a
teenager. I am 40+.
And my primary goal is Gypsy King Software. It isn't a hobby. It is my company. My
heart and soul :-) So beware what criteria you use to define a * serious programmer
*.
I'm approaching 60, Shari. When I was in school, IBM didn't exist.
Thats interesting Dan, as IBM has been around since 1924!
Yeah, bad choice of words. IBM didn't exist in the broad consciousness of the
community. In 1960, when I was in high school, computers were even less evident and
13 matches
Mail list logo
