Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread Richard Gaskin

Shari wrote:
I decided to go back and look at something I had created in Hypercard 
many moons ago, with the thought of beefing it up and re-releasing it.  
Right now it is defunct, working only on very old computers.


Knowing that Metacard should open Hypercard files, I launched MC 2.9, 
and it failed.  Not only wouldn't it open the Hypercard stack, but it 
actually quit on me.


So I went back to MC 2.8.1.  Same thing.

Tried 2.7.4.  Ditto.

Tried MC 2.4.3 (the last version I had before Rev took over MC) and 
wowie zowie, it opened the stack!


That's verty disturbing, since ostensibly nothing in the HC conversion 
code has changed in versions since 2.4.3.


I would encourage you to send your stack and your test results to RunRev 
for evaluation.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FourthWorld.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay

Robert Brenstein wrote:

On 19/05/08 at 08:36 -0700 Richard Gaskin apparently wrote:
That's verty disturbing, since ostensibly nothing in the HC conversion 
code has changed in versions since 2.4.3.


I would encourage you to send your stack and your test results to 
RunRev for evaluation.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation


Hasn't RunRev removed the option to convert HC stack some time ago?


No, it's still there in Studio and Enterprise. They did remove it from 
Media, since that's an entry-level edition with a few features turned off.


I'm not sure why Shari couldn't get results in later versions of the 
engine. I routinely convert HC stacks all the time and have never had a 
problem, with the exception of one single release of -- I think it was 
-- 2.7 where Mark forgot to enable the HC conversion feature. It was 
turned on again in the next point release.


Mark has specifically told me that he hasn't touched the HC conversion 
code at all. It remains exactly as Scott Raney wrote it and he has never 
changed it. So I suspect something else is going on with these 
particular stacks.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread Shari
I have Enterprise.  All my versions have been Enterprise including 
the original Metacard prior to Revolution.


I tried a test of MC 2.9 to see if it would open other old Hypercard 
stacks I had.  I did succeed with one, but others failed.  I don't 
know what differentiates the stacks.  I know that back then I used 
some externals in the resource forks.  But I think all my old stacks 
would have had that.



No, it's still there in Studio and Enterprise. They did remove it 
from Media, since that's an entry-level edition with a few features 
turned off.


I'm not sure why Shari couldn't get results in later versions of the 
engine. I routinely convert HC stacks all the time and have never 
had a problem, with the exception of one single release of -- I 
think it was -- 2.7 where Mark forgot to enable the HC conversion 
feature. It was turned on again in the next point release.


Mark has specifically told me that he hasn't touched the HC 
conversion code at all. It remains exactly as Scott Raney wrote it 
and he has never changed it. So I suspect something else is going on 
with these particular stacks.



--
  Humorous sports t-shirts
  http://www.villagetshirts.com
 WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware games
 http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay

Shari wrote:
I have Enterprise.  All my versions have been Enterprise including the 
original Metacard prior to Revolution.


I tried a test of MC 2.9 to see if it would open other old Hypercard 
stacks I had.  I did succeed with one, but others failed.  I don't know 
what differentiates the stacks.  I know that back then I used some 
externals in the resource forks.  But I think all my old stacks would 
have had that.


I don't think externals would matter, since those are completely ignored 
and are never brought into Rev/MC. When you say the import doesn't work, 
what exactly happens? Do you get an error message? Or could the stack 
just be invisible?


I'd be happy to try one if you want to send me a copy of a stack that 
fails. I've never had one that wouldn't come over.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread Shari
I don't think externals would matter, since those are completely 
ignored and are never brought into Rev/MC. When you say the import 
doesn't work, what exactly happens? Do you get an error message? Or 
could the stack just be invisible?


I'd be happy to try one if you want to send me a copy of a stack 
that fails. I've never had one that wouldn't come over.


Okay, Jacques, I will email it to you?  Will you have difficulty 
receiving an attachment?  Or should I upload it somewhere for you to 
download?


The stack is not seen as a stack file, so I choose the All Files 
option.  I get no scripting error message from Metacard.  It simply 
quits, and I get the Unexpectedly Quit error.


Shari
--
  Humorous sports t-shirts
  http://www.villagetshirts.com
 WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware games
 http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay

Shari wrote:
I don't think externals would matter, since those are completely 
ignored and are never brought into Rev/MC. When you say the import 
doesn't work, what exactly happens? Do you get an error message? Or 
could the stack just be invisible?


I'd be happy to try one if you want to send me a copy of a stack that 
fails. I've never had one that wouldn't come over.


Okay, Jacques, I will email it to you?  Will you have difficulty 
receiving an attachment?  Or should I upload it somewhere for you to 
download?


The stack is not seen as a stack file, so I choose the All Files 
option.  I get no scripting error message from Metacard.  It simply 
quits, and I get the Unexpectedly Quit error.


Interesting. I'll take a look. Email is fine if the stack is under 1-2 
megs or so; anything larger tends to clog up my inbox.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread Shari

Jacques,

I just sent it to you.

As I said, I did finally get into it with my trusty old MC 2.4.3 so I 
am able to access it.  Once 2.4.3 opened it I could save it in a 
format that the newer versions would handle.


Just a bit of a puzzle why I had to go back that far to get in, when 
everybody is saying that the code hasn't ever changed.


Somewhere something must have.

Shari



Interesting. I'll take a look. Email is fine if the stack is under 
1-2 megs or so; anything larger tends to clog up my inbox.



--
  Humorous sports t-shirts
  http://www.villagetshirts.com
 WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware games
 http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay

Shari wrote:

Jacques,

I just sent it to you.

As I said, I did finally get into it with my trusty old MC 2.4.3 so I am 
able to access it.  Once 2.4.3 opened it I could save it in a format 
that the newer versions would handle.


Just a bit of a puzzle why I had to go back that far to get in, when 
everybody is saying that the code hasn't ever changed.


Somewhere something must have.


It opens if I remove all the snd resources. While the HC import itself 
hasn't changed, audio playback has. I'm guessing some of the snd 
resources are pretty old and are crashing the newer engine.


A sudden quit like that usually means there's a bad resource somewhere. 
I'd be curious to know if all the sounds play all right in Rev 2.9 after 
you got the stack to open with MC 2.4.3.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Thank you Metacard 2.4.3!

2008-05-19 Thread Shari
It opens if I remove all the snd resources. While the HC import 
itself hasn't changed, audio playback has. I'm guessing some of the 
snd resources are pretty old and are crashing the newer engine.


A sudden quit like that usually means there's a bad resource 
somewhere. I'd be curious to know if all the sounds play all right 
in Rev 2.9 after you got the stack to open with MC 2.4.3.


I wouldn't leave them in the resource fork.  I don't do single 
platform stacks since leaving Hypercard.  I create one stack for all 
platforms, so I make sure they make all the kitties happy :-)


Funny thing, when I first switched away from Hypercard eons ago I 
hated leaving behind the resource fork.  Now I cannot imagine still 
using it.  I love Metacard's way of embedding sounds, graphics, and 
other stacks.


Shari
--
  Humorous sports t-shirts
  http://www.villagetshirts.com
 WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware games
 http://www.gypsyware.com
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard