Hi
First, I must say: I don't just want a solution for me. I want a solution for
anyone using revolution or metacard.
Second, I think it is reasonable to expect a solution.
The question that raises is how to do the solution.
Richard gives me the impression that there is in fact no way out.
Eric Engle wrote:
First, I must say: I don't just want a solution for me. I want a solution for
anyone using revolution or metacard.
It would only matter to the subset of Rev and MC developers who still
have HyperCard stacks to port.
And really it's the smaller subset who will deal with
On 5/21/05 1:09 PM, Eric Engle wrote:
First, I must say: I don't just want a solution for me. I want a solution for
anyone using revolution or metacard.
Second, I think it is reasonable to expect a solution.
Funny how styles differ. I've probably converted more stacks to MC/Rev
than
: Sunday, May 22, 2005 04:50
To: Discussions on Metacard
Subject: Re: hypercard domenu comptability
On 5/21/05 1:09 PM, Eric Engle wrote:
First, I must say: I don't just want a solution for me. I want a
solution for anyone using revolution or metacard.
Second, I think it is reasonable
Something about metacard that really bothers me... domenu... domenu in
hypercard is really important and convenient.
problem is: the menus in metacard don't match.
solution would be: invisible menu items. E.g. a menu other (invisible, i.e.
visible set to false) could have all the menu items that
Eric Engle wrote:
Something about metacard that really bothers me... domenu... domenu in
hypercard is really important and convenient.
problem is: the menus in metacard don't match.
...
This is an avoidable and easily solved problem. It could even be solved open
source. If rev or metacard promises
Hello Eric Engle,
Something about metacard that really bothers me...
domenu... domenu in hypercard is really important
and convenient.
Indeed. I have longed for doMenu in MC, many times,
for many years. I had a in-depth debate about it with
Scott Raney, back when MC was still owned and hosted
